Hello! Welcome to the final lesson in our "Engineering Workflow and System Design" module.
In our last session, we dug into the specifics of selecting fasteners based on loading conditions, material grades, and thread types. This was the last of several key decision-making processes we've covered, including defining requirements, selecting mechanisms, and choosing materials. Now, it's time to learn how to communicate and defend those decisions in a professional setting.
Today's learning outcome is to structure a design review presentation with technical content and visuals. A design review is a critical milestone in any engineering project. It's where you justify your design to peers, managers, and stakeholders to get their feedback and secure approval to move forward. Mastering this skill is essential for your goal of simulating a real-world engineering workflow and building a compelling portfolio.
1. The Purpose and Process of a Design Review
A design review is more than just a project update; it's a formal, systematic evaluation of your design against its requirements. Its main purpose is to facilitate communication, identify risks, and get expert feedback to optimize the design before committing to expensive manufacturing or prototyping.
To understand the formal context of design reviews in industry, let's start with a foundational document.
This document, 'Design Reviews' from Dalhousie University's Faculty of Engineering, provides a concise, professional overview of the design review process. It explains what they are, why they're useful, and the different types you'll encounter.
Please read the first three pages, covering the sections 'Introduction', 'Types of Reviews', and 'Timing of Design Reviews'. Focus on understanding the difference between a Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and a Critical Design Review (CDR), and the overall goal of the process.
As you read, you'll see that design reviews are checkpoints.
- A Preliminary Design Review (PDR) typically happens after you've established your concept and can show that it's feasible and meets the high-level requirements.
- A Critical Design Review (CDR) occurs when the detailed design is complete, including all part drawings and analyses, right before you would start manufacturing.
While the level of detail changes, the fundamental structure for presenting your work remains consistent.
2. The Anatomy of a Design Review Presentation
A successful design review tells a clear and logical story. It walks the audience from the problem you're trying to solve to the solution you've developed, providing justification for every major decision along the way.
The document you just reviewed contains an excellent sample agenda. We can use this to create a template for a standard design review presentation.
Let's return to the 'Design Reviews' document to study its proposed structure for the meeting itself.
Please read the 'Agenda' section on pages 7-9. Pay close attention to the topics covered and the suggested time allocation. This is the blueprint for your presentation.
Based on that agenda, a typical presentation structure would look like this:
-
Introduction: (5% of time)
- Title Slide: Project Name, Your Name, Date, Review Type (e.g., PDR).
- Agenda/Overview: Briefly state the purpose of the review and what you'll cover.
-
Background & Requirements: (10% of time)
- The Problem: What is the "needs statement"?
- Project Objectives: What are you trying to achieve?
- Key Requirements & Constraints: List the critical design specifications (e.g., load capacity, speed, size, cost).
-
Concept Exploration & Selection:
- Briefly show 2-3 alternative concepts you considered.
- Provide a clear rationale for your selected design approach (e.g., using a decision matrix).
-
Detailed Design & Analysis: (60% of time)
- System Overview: Show the full assembly using CAD models (isometric, section views). Use a functional block diagram if helpful.
- Subsystem Deep Dive: Discuss critical components or mechanisms.
- Justification & Analysis: This is the core of the review. Present the evidence for your design choices:
- Material Selection: Why did you choose specific materials? (Referencing trade-off analyses you learned about).
- Hand Calculations: Show key calculations for stress, deflection, or sizing (like for the lead screw in our upcoming project).
- FEA Results: Present stress, displacement, and factor of safety plots for critical parts.
- Fastener Selection: Justify your choice of fastener type, grade, and size for critical joints.
-
Project Status & Risk: (<10% of time)
- Briefly mention any major schedule or budget points.
- Identify key risks and your plans to mitigate them (your FMEA experience is directly applicable here).
-
Summary & Future Work: (10% of time)
- Summarize key findings and decisions.
- State whether the design is ready to proceed.
- Outline the next steps.
To see what this looks like in practice, browse through this example of a Preliminary Design Review from a university aerospace project. You don't need to understand every detail, but observe how the presentation flows through the sections we just outlined.
Preliminary Design Review D.R.O.P.S
This PDF is an actual PDR presentation for a student project called D.R.O.P.S. It's a great example of putting the theory into practice.
Skim through the presentation. Notice the 'Presentation Overview' (slide 2), 'Project Overview' (slides 3-6), 'Baseline System Design' with CAD visuals (slides 7-9), 'Design Feasibility' (the analysis section, slides 17-55), 'Conclusions' (slide 56), and 'Future Work' (slide 58). This shows you how a real presentation is structured.
3. Creating Compelling Technical Content
Knowing the structure is half the battle. The other half is filling it with clear, convincing content and visuals. Your presentation is not a report to be read; it's a visual aid to support what you're saying.
Tell a Story: What, How, and Results
For every piece of technical work you present, frame it as a short story with a clear beginning, middle, and end. A great framework for this is "What, How, and Results."
How to Create an Engineering Portfolio
While this video is about creating a portfolio, its core principles for presenting project work are directly applicable to a design review. The 'What, How, Results' framework is incredibly effective for communicating technical work concisely.
Watch from 02:01 to 03:24 to understand the core principles, then from 04:46 to 07:15 to see concrete examples of the 'What, How, Results' framework in action.
Let's apply this to a technical example. Imagine presenting an FEA of a bracket:
- What: "I performed a stress analysis on the main support bracket to ensure it could withstand the 500N operating load."
- How: "I used Onshape's FEA tool. I fixed the mounting holes, applied the load to the bearing surface, and assigned 6061-T6 Aluminum as the material."
- Results: "The analysis shows a maximum stress of 150 MPa, which gives us a factor of safety of 1.8 against yielding. The maximum deflection was 0.2 mm, which is within our system's tolerance."
This structure is clear, concise, and answers all the key questions your audience will have.
The "Do's and Don'ts" of Visuals
Effective visuals are the key to a great design review. Your audience should be able to understand the main point of a slide in seconds.

Here are some rules for creating your slides.
The Do's and Don'ts of Effective Presentation Slides
This short video gives some excellent, universal advice on creating effective presentation slides.
Watch from 00:38 to 03:34. Pay attention to the advice on text size, using keywords instead of full sentences, and the mistake of copying and pasting from a report.
Key principles for your design review slides:
- Use high-quality images: Use screenshots from Onshape, clear FEA plots, and simple diagrams.
- Minimal text: Use keywords and short phrases, not paragraphs. The details should come from you, the presenter.
- One idea per slide: Don't cram too much information onto a single slide. Let each key finding have its own moment.
Test your understanding!
Imagine you are preparing a single slide for a design review to justify your fastener choice from the previous lesson's exercise (attaching a steel block to an aluminum plate).
Based on what you've learned today, what content (text and visuals) would you put on this slide?
Show answer
A good slide would include:
- Slide Title: Fastener Selection: Guide Rail Support
- Visual: A clear CAD screenshot or section view showing the steel block, the aluminum plate, and the screw.
- Text (Bulleted Keywords):
- Joint: Steel Support Block to 6061-T6 Aluminum Base
- Decision: M8x1.25 Coarse Thread, Class 8.8 Steel Screw
- Justification: Coarse threads provide larger shear area in weaker aluminum to prevent thread stripping during tightening.
- Preload: Calculated torque ensures slip-critical joint under operating shear loads.
This slide is visual, uses minimal text, and follows the "What, How, Results/Justification" structure. You would then verbally elaborate on each point during the presentation.
Conclusion
You now have a complete framework for structuring and delivering a professional engineering design review. This process transforms your collection of design artifacts—CAD models, calculations, and material lists—into a persuasive narrative that justifies your engineering work.
Key Takeaways:
- A design review is a formal checkpoint to communicate your design, get feedback, and gain approval to proceed.
- Structure your presentation like a story: start with the problem (requirements), explain your solution (design), and provide the evidence (analysis).
- For each technical element, use the "What, How, Results" framework to explain your work clearly and concisely.
- Your slides are visual aids, not a script. Use high-quality images and minimal text to support your verbal explanation.
This lesson concludes the "Engineering Workflow and System Design" module. You've now covered all the foundational elements of a professional design process. In our next lesson, we will begin Project 1: Linear Motion System Design. Your very first task will be to define the requirements for a linear actuator system, which will form the first section of the PDR you will eventually create for that project.