Skip to main content

Welcome to a Grasp lesson

Create a free account to keep studying and create your own study path.

Lesson 18

Internal Energy, Enthalpy, and Specific Heats for Ideal Gases

Recommended resources

Hello! Welcome back.

In our last lesson, we introduced the incredibly useful concepts of specific heat at constant volume () and constant pressure (). We saw how they relate to changes in internal energy and enthalpy through the handy equations and for an ideal gas.

Today, we're going to dive deeper into those relationships. This lesson is all about solidifying one of the most powerful "shortcuts" in thermodynamics. Our goal is to relate changes in internal energy and enthalpy to temperature changes for an ideal gas using specific heats, but with a twist. We'll explore why these simple formulas work for any process, not just the constant-volume or constant-pressure ones we used to derive them. We'll also tackle a real-world complication: what happens when specific heats aren't constant?

This is a crucial step that moves us from basic definitions to flexible problem-solving.

The Ideal Gas Superpower: Why Internal Energy Only Cares About Temperature

Let's start by revisiting a point from last time that might have felt a bit like a magic trick. We derived by looking at a constant volume process. But then I said you can use this formula for any process involving an ideal gas. How can that be?

The answer lies in a fundamental property of ideal gases: For an ideal gas, its internal energy is only a function of its temperature.

Think about it this way. What is internal energy at the molecular level? For an ideal gas, it's almost entirely the kinetic energy of its molecules—how fast they are zipping around and bouncing off each other. Temperature is just our macroscopic measure of this average molecular kinetic energy. So, it makes intuitive sense that if you raise the temperature, you raise the internal energy, and if you lower the temperature, you lower the internal energy, regardless of what the pressure or volume are doing.

Imagine your happiness level is your "internal energy." For an ideal gas, its happiness depends only on how much pizza (temperature) it has. It doesn't care if it's eating the pizza in a small room (constant volume) or a big park (constant pressure). If it goes from one slice to three slices, its happiness increases by the same amount in both scenarios.

This isn't just a convenient idea; it's a physical property that was confirmed experimentally.

To get a great visual explanation of this core concept and the experiment that proved it, let's watch a segment from the video we're using for this module.

Thermodynamics SPECIFIC HEATS - cv & cp - in 12 Minutes!

This video segment explains the famous experiment by Gay-Lussac (and later, Joule) that demonstrated that the internal energy of an ideal gas depends only on its temperature. It also shows how this directly implies that enthalpy is also only a function of temperature for an ideal gas.

Watch the section from 3:58 to 5:59. Pay close attention to the setup of the two connected tanks (one gas, one vacuum) and the conclusion drawn from the fact that the temperature didn't change when the gas expanded freely.

So, to summarize the key takeaway from the video:

  1. Experiments showed that when an ideal gas expands into a vacuum (doing no work and with no heat transfer), its temperature doesn't change.
  2. According to the First Law (), if and , then must be 0.
  3. Even though the gas's volume and pressure changed dramatically, its internal energy didn't change as long as the temperature was constant.
  4. The conclusion: Internal energy is only a function of temperature . We write this as .

And what about enthalpy, ?
We know . For an ideal gas, we also know .
So, . Since depends only on , and is a constant, it must be that enthalpy is also only a function of temperature . We write this as .

This is the "superpower." Because and are state functions that only depend on temperature for an ideal gas, the path taken between two temperatures doesn't matter. The change and will always be the same if the is the same.

This is why we are fully justified in using these equations for ANY process involving an ideal gas:


Recap Break

This was the most important conceptual part of the lesson. Let's lock it in.

  • For an ideal gas, internal energy () and enthalpy () are functions of temperature only.
  • This means that to find the change in internal energy or enthalpy, all you need to know is the change in temperature.
  • The process path (constant pressure, constant volume, or something else) is irrelevant for calculating and .
  • This is why the formulas and are so universally useful for ideal gases.


A Real-World Wrinkle: Specific Heats Aren't Always Constant

So far, we've been using single values for and (like 1.005 kJ/kg·K for air). This is often called the cold-air-standard assumption, where we assume the specific heats are constant at their room temperature values. This is a good approximation for small temperature changes, but it can be inaccurate for large ones.

Why do specific heats change? Think about the molecules again. When we add energy (heat), it increases the kinetic energy of the gas molecules.

  • At low temperatures, this energy mainly goes into making the molecules move faster (translational energy).
  • At higher temperatures, the molecules start to vibrate and rotate more intensely as well. These are new "storage modes" for the energy.

Because it takes extra energy to get these vibrations and rotations going, more energy is required to raise the temperature by one degree. Therefore, the specific heats of most gases increase with temperature.

So, how do we accurately calculate and when and are changing over our temperature range? We have three common methods, ranging from most accurate to most approximate.

The next video segment explains these methods perfectly.

Thermodynamics SPECIFIC HEATS - cv & cp - in 12 Minutes!

This clip details the fact that specific heats are often functions of temperature and introduces the three practical methods engineers use to calculate enthalpy changes: using pre-calculated tables, integrating polynomial functions, and using an average value.

Please watch from 6:24 to 11:31. Focus on understanding the three distinct approaches for finding the change in enthalpy and why using property tables is both the easiest and most accurate method.

Let's summarize those three methods:

Method 1: Use Ideal Gas Property Tables (Most Accurate and Easiest)
For common gases like air, steam, CO₂, etc., engineers have already done the hard work. They have calculated the integrals from a standard reference temperature (like 0 K) and tabulated the results.

  • You will find tables (like Table A-17 for Air in many textbooks) that list internal energy and enthalpy for various temperatures.
  • To find the change, you simply look up the values at your start and end temperatures and subtract:

  • This method automatically accounts for the variation of specific heat with temperature and is the preferred method when tables are available.

Method 2: Use an Average Specific Heat (Good Approximation)
If you don't have tables or want a quicker calculation, you can approximate.

  1. Find the specific heat at the initial temperature, at .
  2. Find the specific heat at the final temperature, at .
  3. Calculate the average specific heat: .
  4. Use this average value as if it were constant:


    This is much more accurate than just using the room temperature value, especially for large temperature changes.

Method 3: Assume Constant Specific Heats (Simplest Approximation)
This is the "cold-air-standard" method we started with. You assume and are constant at some known value (usually room temperature, ~300 K).


This is fine for back-of-the-envelope calculations or when the temperature change is small (less than a couple hundred degrees). But be aware of the potential for error!

Test your understanding!

Question 1: You need to calculate the change in internal energy for nitrogen gas as it goes from 300 K to 1500 K. Which of the three methods would be least accurate? Why?

Show answer

Method 3 (assuming a constant specific heat at 300 K) would be the least accurate. The temperature change is very large (1200 K), and the specific heat of nitrogen will increase significantly over this range. Using only the 300 K value will ignore this increase and lead to a substantial underestimation of the change in internal energy.

Question 2: An ideal gas undergoes a process where its pressure and volume both double. Does its internal energy change? Does its enthalpy change?

Show answer

Yes, both will change. According to the ideal gas law, . If P becomes 2P and V becomes 2V, then the new temperature is related by , which means . Since , this means , so . Because the temperature changes, both internal energy () and enthalpy () must change.


Worked Numerical Problems

Let's see the difference these methods make in a real problem.
Consider heating 1 kg of air from (about 27°C) to (about 727°C). We want to find the change in internal energy, .

Given data:

  • From an ideal gas table for air:
    • At , ,
    • At , ,

Problem 1: Compare the three methods
Calculate using all three methods.

Show step-by-step solution
  • Method 1: Using Property Tables (Exact Solution)
    This is the most direct and accurate way. We just subtract the tabulated values.

  • Method 2: Using Average Specific Heat

    1. Find the average specific heat:
    2. Calculate :


      This is quite close to the exact answer! The error is about 1%.
  • Method 3: Using Constant Specific Heat at 300 K (Cold-Air-Standard)

    1. Assume is constant at its 300 K value: .
    2. Calculate :


      This answer is significantly different from the exact one. The error is about -7.8%. This shows that for large temperature changes, the cold-air-standard assumption can lead to noticeable errors.

Comparison:

  • Exact (Tables): 544.87 kJ/kg
  • Average : 550.55 kJ/kg (+1.0% error)
  • Constant : 502.6 kJ/kg (-7.8% error)

Problem 2: Proving the Path Doesn't Matter
A piston-cylinder contains 0.5 kg of helium. It undergoes a process from an initial state of 150 kPa and 20°C to a final state of 400 kPa and 100°C. For helium, is constant at 3.116 kJ/kg·K. Find the change in internal energy, .

Show step-by-step solution
  1. Identify the Goal: We need to find the total change in internal energy, .
  2. Recognize the Key Principle: Helium is an ideal gas. For an ideal gas, the change in internal energy depends ONLY on the temperature change. The pressure information is irrelevant for finding .
  3. Convert Temperatures to Kelvin:
  4. Calculate the Change in Specific Internal Energy ():
    Since is given as constant, we use the simplest formula.

  5. Calculate the Total Change in Internal Energy ():

Answer: The change in internal energy is 124.64 kJ. The fact that the pressure changed from 150 to 400 kPa doesn't affect this calculation at all, because we are dealing with an ideal gas.


Conclusion

Great job today. We've taken a huge step forward in making our thermodynamic analysis both more powerful and more realistic.

Key Takeaways:

  • The most important property of an ideal gas is that its internal energy () and enthalpy () are functions of temperature alone.
  • This allows us to calculate and using for any process, not just constant volume or constant pressure ones.
  • Specific heats ( and ) are not truly constant; they generally increase with temperature.
  • We have three methods to handle this:
    1. Property Tables: Easiest and most accurate.
    2. Average Specific Heat: A good approximation for larger temperature ranges.
    3. Constant Specific Heat (Cold Air Standard): Simplest, but only accurate for small temperature changes.

Preview of the Next Lesson

In our next two lessons, we're going to put everything from this module together. We'll start by systematically analyzing the four fundamental ideal gas processes:

  1. Constant Volume (Isochoric)
  2. Constant Pressure (Isobaric)
  3. Constant Temperature (Isothermal)
  4. No Heat Transfer (Adiabatic)

For each one, we now know how to calculate and . The next step is to derive expressions for the work () and heat transfer () for each process, allowing us to complete our first law energy balance () for a full range of scenarios. See you then