Skip to main content

Welcome to a Grasp lesson

Create a free account to keep studying and create your own study path.

Lesson 54

Malus's Law and Light Intensity

Recommended resources

Hello! Welcome back to our journey through wave optics.

In our last lesson, we established the fundamental concept of polarization, understanding it as definitive proof that light is a transverse wave. We explored the four main ways to create polarized light: through selective absorption, reflection, scattering, and double refraction.

Today, we transition from the "what" and "how" to the "how much." We will focus on a crucial quantitative aspect of polarization that is a favorite for NEET questions. Our learning outcome is to apply Malus's Law to calculate the intensity of light transmitted through polarizers. You'll learn the mathematical rule that governs how the brightness of light changes when it passes through polarizing filters.

1. From Electric Field to Intensity: The Basis of Malus's Law

Let's recap a key idea from last time: a polarizing filter has a transmission axis. When polarized light hits this filter (which we now call an analyzer to distinguish it from the first filter), only the component of the light's electric field that is parallel to the analyzer's transmission axis gets through.

Imagine a beam of vertically polarized light with an electric field amplitude incident on an analyzer whose transmission axis is tilted at an angle to the vertical.

Malus's Law Illustration
This diagram shows unpolarized light first passing through a polarizer to become vertically polarized with intensity I₀. This polarized light then hits a second filter, an analyzer, whose axis is at an angle θ. The final transmitted intensity is governed by Malus's Law.

From simple trigonometry, the component of the incident electric field amplitude that is parallel to the analyzer's axis is . This is the amplitude of the light wave that emerges from the analyzer.

But how does this relate to the intensity (the brightness) of the light? In wave physics, a fundamental principle is that the intensity of a wave is proportional to the square of its amplitude.

So, if the incident intensity is (proportional to ) and the transmitted intensity is (proportional to ), we can establish a direct relationship.

The following video provides an excellent, step-by-step derivation of this relationship. It first explains the amplitude component and then separately introduces the concept of intensity before combining them to derive the law.

Malus Law (derivation and use) + What is Intensity (Polarisation Part 2 - Waves - Physics)

Watch this clip from Physics Made Easy to see the formal derivation of Malus's Law. Pay close attention to the link between amplitude and intensity.

Watch the video from the beginning up to 06:53. The first part (to 03:10) covers the amplitude component. The second part (03:10 to 05:41) explains intensity. The final part derives the law.

This derivation leads us to the celebrated Malus's Law:

Where:

  • is the intensity of the light transmitted by the analyzer.
  • is the intensity of the polarized light incident on the analyzer.
  • is the angle between the polarization direction of the incident light and the transmission axis of the analyzer.

For a concise written summary of this derivation, you can refer to the "Derivation of Malus Law" section in the Vedantu article.


2. Working with Malus's Law: Key Scenarios

Let's master the two most important scenarios you'll encounter.

Scenario 1: Unpolarized Light Passing Through a Polarizer

What happens when unpolarized light of intensity passes through its first polarizer? Unpolarized light has electric fields oscillating in all random directions. Malus's Law, as written, requires a single incident polarization angle .

To solve this, we average the effect over all possible angles. The average value of over a full cycle (0 to 360 degrees) is .

Therefore, when unpolarized light passes through a polarizer, its intensity is always reduced by half, and it becomes polarized along the transmission axis of that polarizer.

This is a critical first step in almost every problem involving unpolarized light. The orientation of this first polarizer does not matter; it will always transmit 50% of the unpolarized light's intensity.

The following video explains this point very clearly.

Polarisation of Light & Malus' Law with Calculations! // HSC Physics

This short clip from Science Ready explains why the intensity of unpolarized light is halved after passing through a polarizer.

Watch from 04:16 to 05:39. Focus on the explanation that the average of cos²θ is 0.5, leading to the 50% intensity reduction.

Scenario 2: Analyzing Light with a Second Polarizer

Once the light is polarized (with intensity ), we can use Malus's Law directly to find the intensity after it passes through a second polarizer (the analyzer).

Here, is the angle between the transmission axis of the first polarizer and the second polarizer.

Let's consider two special cases:

  • Parallel Polarizers (): , so . All the polarized light passes through.
  • Crossed Polarizers (): , so . No light passes through. This is called extinction.
Test your understanding!

Unpolarized light with an intensity of 16 W/m² is incident on a polarizer.

  1. What is the intensity of the light after it passes through this polarizer?
  2. This polarized light then passes through a second polarizer (an analyzer) whose transmission axis is at 60° to the first one. What is the final intensity?
Show answer
  1. When unpolarized light passes through the first polarizer, its intensity is halved.
    .
  2. Now we use Malus's Law with and .
    .

3. NEET-Style Problem Solving

Your goal is to prepare for the NEET exam, so let's apply these concepts to the types of problems you'll face. The process for a system of polarizers is sequential.

  1. Start with the initial light (unpolarized or polarized).
  2. Calculate the intensity after the first polarizer.
  3. Use that result as the input for the second polarizer.
  4. Repeat for all subsequent polarizers.

This resource contains solved examples from previous JEE exams, which are very similar in style and difficulty to NEET questions. Let's walk through them.

JEE Diffraction and Polarization - Previous Year Questions

This resource from Sathee (IIT Kanpur) provides an excellent bank of solved problems. We will analyze the examples in the 'Polaroid and Malus’s Law' section.

Focus on 'Example 1 (Malus’s Law, 2021)' and 'Example 2 (Three Polarizers, 2022)' under the 'Sample Questions with Detailed Solutions' heading.

Worked Example 1: Two Polarizers

  • Problem: Unpolarized light of intensity passes through two polarizers with transmission axes at 30° to each other. Find the intensity of emergent light.

  • Step 1: First Polarizer

    • The incident light is unpolarized. The first polarizer halves the intensity.
  • Step 2: Second Polarizer

    • The light incident on the second polarizer has intensity and is polarized. The angle between the two polarizers is .
    • Apply Malus's Law:
    • Substitute :
    • Result:

Worked Example 2: Three Polarizers (A Classic Trick)

  • Problem: Three polarizers are placed in series. The first and third have their axes perpendicular (crossed), while the middle one is at 45° to the first. Find the emergent intensity if the initial intensity of unpolarized light is .

  • Step 1: First Polarizer (P1)

    • Unpolarized light. Intensity is halved.
    • . The light is now polarized along the axis of P1.
  • Step 2: Second Polarizer (P2)

    • The angle between P1's axis and P2's axis is .
    • .
    • The light is now polarized along the axis of P2.
  • Step 3: Third Polarizer (P3)

    • P1 and P3 are perpendicular. P2 is at 45° to P1. So, the angle between P2's axis and P3's axis is also .
    • Result:

Notice the fascinating result: if you remove the middle polarizer, the first and third are crossed, and the final intensity would be zero! The middle polarizer effectively "rotates" the plane of polarization, allowing some light to pass through the final filter.

NEET-Style Practice Problem

Unpolarized light of intensity is passed through three polarizers. The axis of the second polarizer is inclined at 30° to the first, and the axis of the third is inclined at 60° to the second. What is the intensity of the light emerging from the third polarizer?

Show answer
  • After 1st Polarizer: .
  • After 2nd Polarizer: The angle between the first and second is .
    .
  • After 3rd Polarizer: The angle between the second and third is .
    .

The final intensity is .


Conclusion

You've now mastered the core mathematical tool for analyzing polarized light. By breaking down problems sequentially, you can confidently tackle questions involving multiple polarizers. Remember the two key rules, and you'll be well-prepared for this topic on the NEET.

Key Takeaways:

  • Malus's Law for polarized light is .
  • is always the angle between the polarization of the incident light and the transmission axis of the current filter.
  • The first step for unpolarized light is always to halve the intensity: .
  • For systems with multiple polarizers, calculate the intensity change at each step, using the output of one as the input for the next.

Preview of the Next Lesson:
In our previous lesson, we mentioned that polarization also occurs naturally. In the next lesson, we will focus on polarization by reflection. We will derive and apply Brewster's Law, which gives the specific angle of incidence at which reflected light from a surface becomes perfectly polarized. This will add another important quantitative tool to your wave optics arsenal.