Recommended resources
The freely available resources this lesson will direct you to.
- Steven Kivelson | Superconductivity and Quantum Mechanics at the Macro-Scale - 1 of 2www.youtube.com
- London Equations & London Penetration Depth | Superconductivity | Condensed Matter Physicswww.youtube.com
- phenomenology of superconductivitycourses.physics.ucsd.edu
- Lecture Note on Superconductivity, Solid State Physicsfulvioparmigiani.com
Hello! Welcome to the tenth module of our course.
In the previous modules, we have journeyed through the electronic and vibrational properties of solids, culminating in a deep dive into the complex world of strongly correlated systems with Dynamical Mean-Field Theory. We are now shifting our focus to an equally profound, but distinct, collective quantum phenomenon: superconductivity. This topic is a cornerstone of modern condensed matter physics, and understanding its foundations is crucial.
This first lesson will establish the phenomenological basis of superconductivity. We will move away from the microscopic Hamiltonians of the last module and instead focus on the striking macroscopic behaviors that define a superconductor. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to describe the three fundamental experimental hallmarks of this state: perfect conductivity (zero resistance), the Meissner effect (perfect diamagnetism), and magnetic flux quantization.
1. The Discovery and Zero Resistance
Superconductivity was discovered in 1911 by Heike Kamerlingh Onnes, who observed that the electrical resistance of mercury vanished abruptly below a critical temperature, , of 4.2 K. While this might sound like the simple behavior of a "perfect" conductor, the reality is much more subtle and profound.
To begin, let's explore this foundational property with a lecture from a leading physicist in the field.
Steven Kivelson | Superconductivity and Quantum Mechanics at the Macro-Scale - 1 of 2
In this segment from a lecture by Prof. Steven Kivelson at Stanford, he discusses the concept of zero resistance and the crucial experiment that truly defines it: the persistent current.
Please watch the following two segments. First, from 15:16 to 18:30, where Prof. Kivelson sets the stage by discussing the resistivity of normal metals at low temperatures. Then, watch from 27:30 to 32:00, where he explains the persistent current experiment, which provides the definitive evidence for zero resistance.
As Prof. Kivelson explains, simply measuring a very small resistance isn't enough to claim it's truly zero. The most compelling evidence comes from persistent currents. When a current is induced in a superconducting ring, it flows indefinitely without any measurable decay. Experiments have set lower bounds on the decay time that are longer than the age of the universe. This implies a state of matter with fundamentally zero dissipation for DC currents, unlike a normal metal where scattering from impurities and phonons always leads to resistance.
2. The Meissner Effect: A Defining Characteristic
For over two decades after its discovery, superconductivity was thought of as simply a state of infinite conductivity. The true, defining feature that distinguishes a superconductor from a hypothetical "perfect conductor" was discovered in 1933 by Meissner and Ochsenfeld.
A perfect conductor, according to Faraday's law of induction (), would maintain whatever magnetic field was present when it became "perfect." Since , infinite conductivity () implies . This leads to , meaning the magnetic field inside is frozen in time.
A superconductor does something far more remarkable.
phenomenology of superconductivity
This section from a set of lecture notes by Prof. Daniel Arovas (UCSD) provides a concise summary of the key phenomenological properties of superconductors.
Please read section 11.1, 'Basic Phenomenology of Superconductors' (pages 2-4). Pay special attention to the part describing 'Flux expulsion' and how it differs from the behavior of a perfect metal.
As the reading highlights, a superconductor actively expels magnetic fields from its interior when cooled below . This phenomenon, the Meissner effect, demonstrates that the superconducting state is a true thermodynamic phase where the magnetic induction inside the bulk material. This property is also known as perfect diamagnetism. The magnetic field only penetrates a small distance near the surface, known as the London penetration depth, .

The London equations, a simple phenomenological model, provide a first theoretical explanation for the Meissner effect. Let's see how this works.
London Equations & London Penetration Depth | Superconductivity | Condensed Matter Physics
This short video explains how the London equations lead directly to the exponential decay of the magnetic field inside a superconductor, providing a mathematical basis for the Meissner effect.
Please watch from 02:27 to 03:44. This segment shows the derivation of the exponential suppression of the magnetic field and introduces the London penetration depth.
This expulsion is the key to famous demonstrations like magnetic levitation, which we will see shortly.
Test your understanding!
Consider a solid sphere made of a material that becomes superconducting below . We perform two different experiments:
- Path A: The sphere is cooled in zero magnetic field to a temperature . Then, a uniform external magnetic field is applied.
- Path B: A uniform external magnetic field is applied to the sphere at a temperature . Then, while the field is held constant, the sphere is cooled to .
What is the final magnetic induction inside the sphere in each case? How would the result for Path B be different if the sphere were a "perfect conductor" but not a superconductor?
Show answer
For the superconductor, the final state is independent of the path. In both Path A and Path B, the final magnetic induction inside the sphere will be due to the Meissner effect.
For a hypothetical "perfect conductor" in Path B, the initial magnetic field would be "frozen" inside as it cools. Since , the field it had just before becoming perfect would remain. Therefore, the final state would have inside. This difference in Path B is the crucial distinction between a perfect conductor and a superconductor.
3. Flux Quantization: Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics
The final hallmark is perhaps the most direct evidence of the quantum mechanical nature of superconductivity on a macroscopic scale. If a superconductor is formed into a ring or any shape with a hole, any magnetic flux () passing through that hole is quantized.

The flux is not just quantized; it's quantized in units of .
Steven Kivelson | Superconductivity and Quantum Mechanics at the Macro-Scale - 1 of 2
Let's return to Prof. Kivelson's lecture, where he discusses the discovery and significance of flux quantization.
Watch from 51:42 to 54:55. Notice the emphasis on the '2' in the denominator of the flux quantum, hc/2e.
The appearance of Planck's constant, , confirms this is a quantum effect. More strikingly, the charge 2e in the denominator was a profound early clue that the charge carriers responsible for superconductivity are not single electrons, but bound pairs of electrons. These Cooper pairs are the foundation of the microscopic theory of superconductivity (BCS theory), which we will explore later in this module.
The quantization condition arises from the requirement that the macroscopic quantum wavefunction describing all the Cooper pairs must be single-valued. As one traverses a path around the hole within the superconductor, the phase of the wavefunction must return to its original value (modulo ), which constrains the enclosed magnetic flux to be an integer multiple of .
4. A Glimpse Ahead: Type I and Type II Superconductors
The phenomena we've discussed are universal to all superconductors. However, their behavior in a magnetic field allows for a crucial classification into two types. Your experience with experiments in high magnetic fields makes this distinction particularly relevant.
-
Type I Superconductors: These exhibit a complete Meissner effect up to a critical magnetic field , above which superconductivity is abruptly destroyed and the material becomes normal. Most pure elemental superconductors (e.g., Lead, Tin, Mercury) are Type I.
-
Type II Superconductors: These materials have two critical fields, and .
- For , they behave like Type I superconductors, with a complete Meissner effect.
- For , they enter a mixed state or vortex state. The magnetic field penetrates the material in the form of quantized flux tubes (vortices), each carrying a single flux quantum . The regions outside the vortex cores remain superconducting.
- For , the material becomes fully normal.
- Most alloys and all high-temperature superconductors are Type II.
This ability of Type II superconductors to remain superconducting in the presence of high magnetic fields is what makes them useful for applications like MRI machines and particle accelerators. It also explains the stable magnetic levitation seen in demonstrations.
Steven Kivelson | Superconductivity and Quantum Mechanics at the Macro-Scale - 1 of 2
Finally, let's see how this distinction between Type I and Type II materials explains the phenomenon of magnetic levitation.
Watch from 01:00:58 to 01:08:26. This segment explains the two types and concludes with a classic levitation demonstration using a high-temperature (Type II) superconductor.
Conclusion
In this lesson, we have laid the experimental and phenomenological groundwork for our study of superconductivity. We've seen that it's not just a state of zero resistance but a distinct thermodynamic phase of matter with unique properties.
Key Takeaways:
- Zero Resistance: The DC electrical resistance vanishes completely below . This is best demonstrated by persistent currents in superconducting rings, which flow without any observable decay.
- Meissner Effect: A superconductor actively expels magnetic fields from its interior, behaving as a perfect diamagnet (). This is the key property that distinguishes it from a simple "perfect conductor."
- Flux Quantization: Magnetic flux trapped in a hole within a superconductor is quantized in units of the superconducting flux quantum, . The factor of
2eprovides crucial evidence for electron pairing. - Type I vs. Type II: Superconductors are classified by their response to magnetic fields. Type II materials allow partial flux penetration in a "mixed state," which enables them to remain superconducting at much higher fields than Type I materials.
Preview of the Next Lesson
We have described what a superconductor does. In the next lesson, we will begin to explore how to model this behavior. We will introduce Ginzburg-Landau theory, a powerful phenomenological framework. We will use it to apply Ginzburg-Landau theory to define the coherence length and penetration depth, and distinguish Type I and Type II superconductors, putting a more quantitative footing on the concepts we introduced today.