Recommended resources
The freely available resources this lesson will direct you to.
Hello! Last time, you turned a Reel into a beat sheet: a record of what the viewer sees, hears, and reads, and when each beat changes. Today we’ll give your future prompt-to-edit system another kind of instruction: an output profile. It will tell the system what to prepare for an Instagram Reel, a YouTube Short, or a YouTube long-form video without forcing every job into the same shape.
By the end, you’ll be able to specify the fields in each profile and distinguish three things that are easy to confuse: a platform’s published requirements, your preferred editing defaults, and decisions that depend on the particular footage.
What a profile controls—and what it does not
Imagine supplying one folder of footage with the instruction, “Make a useful clip about the phone-stand setup.” The job instruction identifies the subject and intended message. A profile supplies reusable choices: the canvas shape, preferred duration, caption treatment, framing checks, and delivery files.
A profile should not decide that every video needs the same hook or cut every two seconds. Those choices depend on the material. Nor can a profile guarantee reach or determine that footage contains a convincing payoff. Its job is to give the editor—or an AI planning the edit—a consistent starting point and a list of checks.
It helps to label each field by its source of authority:
- Platform requirement or documented feature: something to check against current platform guidance.
- Your default: a choice you can change when a different one better serves the video.
- Per-video instruction: a value supplied for this particular job, such as the target viewer or desired action.
- Review item: something the system can propose but a person should confirm.
The distinction matters because platform interfaces and eligibility rules change, while your preference for, say, restrained captions may remain useful. Store a last-checked date alongside platform-dependent rules rather than treating a profile as permanent.
Start with the frame, not the platform name
An aspect ratio expresses width relative to height. A frame is tall; a frame is wide. For example, pixels is , while is . Those pixel dimensions are useful starter canvas choices, not universal requirements for all three destinations.
Read Instagram’s own guidance before choosing the Reel defaults:
Reel size & aspect ratios on Instagram
Read Instagram Help Center’s Reel size guidance to separate what the service accepts from the narrower format we will choose as our default.
In “Reels Resolution and Size,” read the format guidance. Then, in “Cover Photo Size,” read the cover guidance. Notice that the accepted upload range is broader than one vertical canvas, while the cover is a separate publishing asset.
Instagram accepts a range of Reel aspect ratios; choosing vertical is our deliberate default for a phone-first Reel, not a claim that every other ratio is rejected. The Help Center also states a minimum frame rate of 30 FPS and a minimum resolution of 720 pixels. A starter Reel profile can therefore specify a , 30 FPS output, with a final check against the current guidance.
A cover needs its own field. The Help Center recommends pixels for a Reel cover and notes that the cover cannot currently be edited after upload. That makes cover selection and review more than an afterthought. It does not mean the cover and the video should use identical framing.
For YouTube Shorts, we can also choose a vertical starter canvas. For YouTube long-form, horizontal is a practical starter. Neither choice should be stored as “YouTube requires this.” If a source or intended presentation calls for something different, the job should be able to override the default, subject to checking current upload and classification guidance.
Framing has another consequence: text or a face that looks fine in an editor may be obscured by playback controls or cropped in another place the video appears. Give each profile a text-safe placement rule and require a preview in the actual viewing context. Do not treat one fixed pixel margin as a guarantee across devices and interfaces.
Give each destination a distinct editing brief
The dimensions alone do not make three useful profiles. They need separate creative defaults—clearly marked as starting hypotheses rather than platform laws.
Ryan Spenner’s comparison offers an example of how a creator thinks about framing for Instagram and discoverable titles for Shorts. Watch it as a perspective to evaluate, not as an official description of either platform’s ranking system.
TikTok vs. Instagram Reels vs. Youtube Shorts: Where Should You Post?
Watch the relevant excerpts of “TikTok vs. Instagram Reels vs. Youtube Shorts: Where Should You Post?” by Ryan Spenner for two contrasting publishing considerations.
In the Instagram segment, watch framing choices, especially the concern about how an opening may appear outside the dedicated Reels view. Skip to the YouTube Shorts segment for title emphasis. Treat these as creator judgments to test against your own audience and current platform guidance.
Here are three illustrative starter briefs:
Instagram Reels profile. Prefer a vertical composition that remains understandable on a phone. Keep the opening’s essential subject and text away from uncertain crop and interface areas. Specify whether the edit needs spoken-word captions, an opening headline, or both; they should not compete for the same space. Include a proposed cover and a separate cover review. A target of 20–45 seconds might suit a single demonstration, but it is your chosen target, not an Instagram length rule.
YouTube Shorts profile. Start with a vertical phone-oriented edit and the same readability checks, but give the publishing package its own title field. If the topic answers a recognizable question, the title can describe that question plainly rather than relying only on an intriguing on-video headline. Include optional description and related-video fields. A 20–60-second target is an example for this course’s early jobs, not a statement of the Shorts eligibility limit; verify current eligibility before publishing.
YouTube long-form profile. Start with a horizontal canvas and a duration goal, such as 8–15 minutes when the footage supports it. Preserve the context needed to understand a complete explanation or story rather than extracting only high-scoring moments. Allow an opening promise, section boundaries, an optional chapter plan, and a conclusion. The exact structure belongs to the video’s edit plan, not to an inflexible template. Its publishing package should anticipate a title, description, and thumbnail for review.
These defaults differ, but none instructs the AI to manufacture substance. If a five-minute source contains only one coherent 40-second demonstration, a profile cannot turn it into a sound 12-minute video. The system should report the mismatch and propose a shorter deliverable or request more material.
Specify the fields your system will actually read
You do not need to write code yet. Think of a profile as a named card with consistently labeled spaces. Later, those labels can become configuration values; for now, precise meanings matter more than syntax.
| Field group | What to specify |
|---|---|
| Identity and currency | Profile name, destination, version, and date platform-dependent guidance was last checked. |
| Canvas and export | Orientation, aspect ratio, output width and height, frame rate, and preferred file/export preset. Mark defaults separately from verified minimums. |
| Runtime | Preferred range and whether it is a flexible creative target or a currently verified eligibility limit. |
| Framing and text | Subject-framing priority, caption on/off and style, headline treatment, and safe-placement check. |
| Edit structure | Opening goal, pacing preference, whether sections or chapters are useful, and what kind of ending or viewer action to consider. |
| Publishing package | Proposed title or post text, description where applicable, cover or thumbnail, and any platform-specific optional fields. |
| Review and overrides | Items requiring approval, plus which defaults a per-video instruction may change. |
The preferred file/export preset is a workflow setting: it tells your eventual Resolve-based system what deliverable to prepare. The profile should retain an editable timeline as a separate requested output when you want to revise the AI’s first pass. It should not confuse “export a video” with “publish it.”
Likewise, “captions on” is not a complete specification. An editor needs to know whether to prepare timed spoken-word captions, how much text may appear at once, what visual treatment to start with, and whether captions must be checked against interface overlays. These are fields you can specify now; you will work on their precise implementation later in the course.
A useful override rule is: the job may change a preference, but it must not silently bypass a verified constraint or a required review. “Use a calmer pace for this interview” can override the pacing default. “Put all essential text at the very bottom” should trigger a placement check, not automatic obedience.
Keep publishing decisions separate from editing decisions
An exported file does not contain every choice needed to publish it. YouTube’s upload guidance makes this especially clear.
Upload YouTube videos - Computer
Read YouTube Help’s computer-upload guide to identify which profile fields produce suggestions and which require a truthful publishing decision.
In the video-details table, read Title through Audience; find the rows by their labels, including Description and Thumbnail. Also locate the “Related Video” row, beginning “A video from your channel that appears as a link,” for an optional Shorts publishing field. In the additional-settings table, read Altered content and Automatic chapters, then find the “Language and caption certification” and “Visibility” rows near the bottom. Finally, under “Visibility,” read publishing choices. Focus on which values an AI could draft and which the uploader must verify.
For either YouTube profile, an AI may draft a title and description. A long-form profile can also request a proposed chapter list. A Shorts profile can carry an optional related-video suggestion if an eligible video exists. Those are helpful outputs, not instructions to publish without inspection.
Other settings need a different treatment. Whether content is made for kids, whether realistic altered or synthetic content needs disclosure, and whether a video should be public, unlisted, private, or scheduled are review decisions. The system can flag the relevant setting and ask for confirmation; it should not infer your legal or publishing choices merely from an editing style. For Instagram, likewise, a proposed cover and post text are deliverables to approve.
This separation suggests two practical statuses for each publishing field: “drafted for review” and “confirmed by uploader.” It keeps your planned automation useful without pretending that producing a polished edit is the same as making every release decision.
How the three profiles work on one piece of footage
Return to the fictional phone-stand demonstration from the previous lesson. Suppose the folder contains a landscape recording of the full setup and a close-up of the final steady shot. The instruction is: “Teach someone to film a hands-on demonstration without holding the phone.”
With the Instagram Reels profile, the proposed edit might use the visible wobble as its opening problem, show the stand adjustment, and hold on the steady result. The planner would flag that the landscape recording needs a vertical crop, check that both hands and the stand remain visible, and propose a cover showing the result.
With the YouTube Shorts profile, much of that edit might remain usable. The differences need not be a wholesale rebuild: the system could propose a clearer searchable title, prepare the YouTube publishing fields, and check its vertical framing and on-screen text in the Shorts viewing context. If you have a relevant full tutorial, it could suggest a related video for review.
With the YouTube long-form profile, the question is not “How do we stretch the Reel?” It is “Does the source contain enough explanation to support a complete tutorial?” If it does, the plan can retain the choice of stand, positioning, adjustment, and final test, with section boundaries where they help navigation. If it does not, the profile should expose that limitation.
This is why a profile specifies both what to produce and what to check. It does not replace the beat-level judgment you practiced last time.
Takeaways
A usable output profile is more than a resolution preset. For Instagram Reels, YouTube Shorts, and YouTube long-form, specify the canvas, runtime target, framing and text treatment, edit-structure preferences, export deliverable, publishing package, and required reviews. Label platform guidance separately from your defaults, date-check changeable rules, and let per-video instructions override preferences without silently skipping safeguards.
Next, we’ll put a boundary around another configurable part of this system: how much cloud processing a video may use, and what footage or transcripts may leave your computer.