Hello! Welcome back.
In our last lesson, you took a critical step from identifying risk to actively managing it by proposing and documenting mitigation strategies for your FMEA. You now have a record not just of a potential problem, but of your engineering solution to prevent it. This FMEA, along with your FEA from Module 4, represents a significant body of analytical work.
Today's lesson is about transforming all that work—the requirements, the design choices, the analyses, and the solutions—into a coherent and compelling summary. The goal is to learn how to summarize key design decisions, analysis results, and solutions for the project.
This skill is the bridge between doing the engineering and communicating its value. A well-structured summary is the heart of a portfolio entry and the backbone of a professional design review.
1. From a List of Facts to a Compelling Story
As a design engineer, you make countless decisions and perform various analyses. Simply listing them chronologically is not effective. Your goal is to tell a story that answers four fundamental questions for your audience (e.g., a hiring manager or a project lead):
- The Problem (Why?): What was the objective? What were the critical design requirements?
- The Solution (What?): What did you ultimately design to solve the problem?
- The Process (How?): What was your design process? What key decisions did you make, and what analyses (like FEA or FMEA) did you use to justify them?
- The Result (So What?): How did your design perform against the requirements? How do you know it works? This is where you present the outcomes of your analyses.
This structure is a simplified version of a formal design report, which typically contains three main parts: a description of the problem, a description of the design, and an evaluation of the design. All three are essential to communicate a solution effectively.
2. A Practical Framework: What, How, and Results
For a portfolio, one of the most effective and widely used structures is the "What, How, and Results" framework. It's concise, clear, and focuses on what a potential employer wants to see: what you did, the skills you used, and the impact you had.
This video is an excellent guide to building a portfolio and clearly explains this framework.
How to Create an Engineering Portfolio
Watch this video from Tamer Shaheen on creating an engineering portfolio. It provides a perfect walkthrough of the 'What, How, and Results' framework that you can use to structure your project summaries.
Pay close attention to these three parts: 02:01 - 02:28: Understand the core principles of a good portfolio project summary. 04:18 - 08:15: See how the presenter applies the 'What, How, Results' structure to his own projects. Notice how he includes visuals and quantifies his results. 09:56 - 11:00: Listen to the detailed explanation of what each section—'What', 'How', and 'Results'—should contain. The emphasis on using numbers to back up results is particularly important.
Here's a static example from the video, showing the framework in action.

3. Elevating Your Summary with Storytelling: The SCR Framework
To make your summary even more compelling, especially in a design review presentation, you can use a narrative structure popular in top consulting and business environments: Situation, Complication, Resolution (SCR).
This framework transforms your summary from a report into a story of you as a problem-solver.
- Situation: The initial context and goal.
- Example: "The project required a linear motion system for a desktop CNC capable of a 200N load with a positioning accuracy of 0.1mm."
- Complication: The key challenge or problem that arose during the design process. This is the perfect place to introduce your analysis findings.
- Example: "Initial FEA on the motor bracket revealed stress concentrations exceeding the material's yield strength. Furthermore, an FMEA identified dust contamination as a high-risk failure mode (RPN=168) that could lead to premature bearing wear."
- Resolution: Your solution and the evidence that it works.
- Example: "The bracket was redesigned with reinforcing ribs, and a follow-up FEA confirmed the Factor of Safety increased to 3.5. To address contamination, a protective bellows was added, reducing the failure mode's RPN by 70% to 56."
This video explains the SCR framework and, crucially, introduces a professional technique for outlining your story before you start making slides.
Storytelling in PowerPoint: Learn McKinsey’s 3-Step Framework
This video by Dan Galletta explains the SCR framework used by firms like McKinsey. While it's aimed at business presentations, the principles are directly applicable to engineering design reviews.
Focus on these parts: 01:30 - 03:13: Understand the SCR (Situation, Complication, Resolution) framework. 05:04 - 08:27: Learn the powerful 'dot-dash' method for outlining your story. This is a critical professional skill. A 'dot' is a main point or claim, and the 'dashes' are the data points that support it. 08:47 - 10:29: See how the dot-dash outline translates directly into a slide deck, with 'dots' becoming action titles and 'dashes' becoming the content in the slide body.
Test your understanding!
You are summarizing your work on the lead screw selection for Project 1. How would you frame this using the SCR framework?
- Situation: What was the initial requirement?
- Complication: What was a key trade-off or challenge you faced in selection? (e.g., cost vs. precision, efficiency, etc.)
- Resolution: What did you choose and why? What calculation or data point supports your choice?
Show answer
- Situation: The system required a lead screw to translate motor rotation into linear motion, capable of handling a 200N axial load.
- Complication: A standard trapezoidal lead screw was low-cost but had low efficiency (~40-50%), requiring a larger, more expensive motor. A ball screw offered high efficiency (>90%) but at a significantly higher component cost.
- Resolution: A cost-benefit analysis showed that the higher initial cost of the ball screw was offset by the savings from a smaller, less powerful motor. A specific ball screw was selected that met the load requirements with a 92% efficiency rating, optimizing the overall system cost and performance.
4. Your Task: Create a "Dot-Dash" Outline for Project 1
Your assignment is to synthesize everything you've done on Project 1 into a structured summary. Using the "dot-dash" method you just learned is the most effective way to do this.
Open a text editor or word processor and create an outline for your linear motion system project. This outline should have 3-5 main points ("dots") that tell the story of your project. Under each dot, add supporting data and evidence ("dashes").
Here is a template to guide you. Fill it in with the specific details from your project.
Project Title: Design of a Linear Motion System
-
Dot 1: The project goal was to design a robust linear motion system for a specified load and speed.
- Dash: Requirement: Axial load capacity > 200 N.
- Dash: Requirement: Max speed > 150 mm/s.
- Dash: Requirement: Factor of Safety on structural components > 2.0.
-
Dot 2: Key components were selected and designed to meet performance and cost targets.
- Dash: A ball screw was chosen over a lead screw for its high efficiency, enabling the use of a smaller motor.
- Dash: Sizing calculations were performed to select a 16mm diameter ball screw.
- Dash: Standard linear guide rails and bearing blocks were selected from a supplier catalog based on load capacity.
-
Dot 3: Structural components were designed in OnShape and validated using FEA.
- Dash: Custom mounting brackets for the motor and end-supports were designed.
- Dash: FEA on the initial motor bracket design showed a FoS of 1.5 under full load, which was below the requirement.
- Dash: The bracket was redesigned with stiffening ribs, and subsequent FEA confirmed the FoS increased to 3.5.
-
Dot 4: A risk assessment (FMEA) was conducted to identify and mitigate potential failures.
- Dash: FMEA identified contamination of the guide rails as a high-risk failure mode (RPN = [Your calculated RPN]).
- Dash: A mitigation strategy of adding a protective bellows cover was proposed.
- Dash: This action is projected to reduce the Occurrence rating from [Your O] to [Your New O], lowering the RPN to [Your New RPN].
-
Dot 5: The final design meets all key requirements and is documented in a complete CAD assembly and BOM.
- Dash: The top-level assembly in OnShape includes all components and mates.
- Dash: A preliminary Bill of Materials has been generated, estimating a total component cost of [Your estimate].
This outline is now the definitive summary of your project.
Conclusion
Today you've learned how to structure and articulate the story of your engineering project. This is not just an academic exercise; it's a core professional competency. You now have two powerful frameworks—"What, How, Results" and "SCR"—and a practical method—the "dot-dash" outline—to prepare your work for any audience.
Key Takeaways:
- A project summary should be a narrative, not just a list of facts.
- The "What, How, Results" framework is ideal for concise portfolio entries.
- The "SCR" (Situation, Complication, Resolution) framework helps you tell a compelling story of engineering problem-solving.
- The "dot-dash" method is a professional-grade technique for building your story with claims supported by evidence.
Preview of the Next Lesson:
The outline you just created is the perfect script for your design review. In our next lesson, you will create a complete design review presentation for the linear motion system project. We will take your dot-dash outline and translate it directly into a professional PowerPoint or Google Slides presentation, focusing on visual communication and effective delivery.