Skip to main content

Welcome to a Grasp lesson

Create a free account to keep studying and create your own study path.

Lesson 98

Grid Queue Bottlenecks and Delays

Recommended resources

Hello! Welcome to the next lesson in our module on System Inefficiencies.

In our last session, we analyzed the economic inefficiencies of renewable curtailment, where we are forced to pay to turn off cheap, clean energy and pay even more to turn on expensive, polluting energy due to physical bottlenecks in the grid. This is a problem of managing the energy that's already connected.

Today, we're going to investigate a related but distinct inefficiency: the challenge of getting new, clean energy sources connected in the first place. We'll explore the grid connection queue, a major bottleneck that is slowing down the UK's transition to a decarbonized electricity system. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to explain why this queue has become so long and what causes the significant delays for new generation and storage projects.

1. The Great Gridlock: What is the Connection Queue?

Imagine a single-lane road leading to a new housing development. If hundreds of construction trucks arrive at once, you get a huge traffic jam. The grid connection queue is the energy equivalent of this. It's the list of proposed power projects—from wind farms and solar parks to large-scale batteries—that have applied and are waiting for a slot to connect to the electricity network.

The problem is that this queue has become incredibly long, creating a major roadblock for the UK's net-zero ambitions.

To understand the sheer scale of this "gridlock", please read the beginning of the following article, which lays out the core problem.

Grid connections reform: what do you need to know?

This article from Solar Power Portal, titled 'Grid connections reform: what do you need to know?', provides a stark overview of the problem. It highlights the staggering volume of projects waiting to connect.

Please read the introduction and the first two main sections, ending just before the heading 'The application process will completely change...'. Focus on the statistics cited (the total gigawatts in the queue versus the UK's peak demand) and the reasons given for the queue's dramatic growth.

As the article explains, the numbers are astonishing:

  • Over 700 GW of generation and storage projects are contracted to connect.
  • The UK's peak electricity demand is only around 50 GW.
  • Some projects are being given connection dates as far out as 2043—almost two decades away.

This isn't just about a few delayed projects; it's a systemic issue affecting hundreds of gigawatts of clean energy, as shown by the backlog just for battery storage projects.

Battery Energy Storage Capacity in UK Transmission Connection Queue by Year
This bar chart shows the huge pipeline of battery storage projects waiting to connect to the transmission grid. The total capacity in the queue is over 50 GW, far exceeding the amount currently connected, with connection dates stretching out over the next decade.

2. What's Causing the Jam?

So, why is the queue so long and the delays so severe? It’s a combination of an outdated process, speculative applications, and physical grid limitations.

a) A "First-Come, First-Served" Fiasco

Historically, the connection process has operated on a "first-come, first-served" basis. Projects were assessed in the order they applied. While this sounds fair, it created a major flaw: a large, purely speculative project that applied early could get a place in the queue and block the path for dozens of smaller, more advanced projects that applied later. The grid operator would have to model the impact of the first project and plan upgrades for it, even if it had no realistic chance of ever being built. This creates a cascade of delays for everyone else behind it.

b) "Zombie" Projects and Speculation

The "first-come, first-served" system encouraged developers to submit applications as early as possible, often before they had secured land rights, planning permission, or funding. These are sometimes called "zombie projects" because they are not yet viable but occupy a valuable spot in the queue.

As the article you read highlighted, the National Grid ESO is trying to clear out projects that are "more speculative, or that simply aren’t progressing" to make way for those that are genuinely ready to be built, often called "shovel-ready" projects.

c) An Outdated Road Network

The final piece of the puzzle is the physical grid itself. As we've discussed in previous lessons, the UK grid was designed for a few large, predictable power stations.

The Challenge & Opportunity for the UK's Electricity Network

This article from Adler & Allan summarises how the grid's original design clashes with the needs of modern renewable energy.

Please read the short section titled 'Connection queue and project delays'. It provides a concise explanation of this issue.

Connecting dozens of new wind and solar farms, often in the same windy or sunny (and therefore "constrained") parts of the country, requires massive and time-consuming physical upgrades to the network—new lines, larger transformers, and more sophisticated substations. A connection offer isn't just a "plug socket"; it's a contract that may require years of civil engineering work to fulfil.


3. Clearing the Queue: The Connections Reform

The good news is that this broken system is being completely overhauled. The National Grid Electricity System Operator (ESO) has introduced a major reform to move away from the "first-come, first-served" model to a new, milestones-based approach.

The new system is often described as a "gated" process, designed to filter out speculative projects and fast-track those that are ready to go.

Grid Connection Queue Process Reforms
This flowchart illustrates the new connections process. New projects must pass through 'Gate 1' and 'Gate 2'. Crucially, existing projects in the queue must now meet the 'Gate 2' criteria (like having planning permission) to keep their place and potentially get an earlier connection date. Those that fail are moved back.

To understand how this new process works and what it requires from developers, let's return to the Solar Power Portal article.

Grid connections reform: what do you need to know?

The second half of the article explains the mechanics of the new 'gated' process and what it means for projects both new and old.

Please read the section titled 'The application process will completely change...'. Focus on understanding the 'Gate 2' requirements and the concept of 'milestones'.

The key change is the introduction of Gate 2. To pass through this gate and secure a firm place in the queue, a project must prove it is making real progress by meeting key milestones. The most important of these is demonstrating that it has land rights and is ready to submit its planning application.

By applying these criteria to all projects—even those already in the queue—the ESO hopes to:

  1. Remove "zombie" projects, freeing up gigawatts of grid capacity.
  2. Prioritise "shovel-ready" projects, allowing them to connect much faster.
  3. Provide better information for planning grid upgrades, as the ESO can focus its investment on infrastructure for projects that are actually going to be built.
Test your understanding!

Imagine two solar farm projects, Project A and Project B, want to connect to the same part of the grid.

  • Project A is speculative. It applied in 2022 but has not yet secured land rights.
  • Project B is "shovel-ready". It applied in 2023 and already has full planning permission and land rights.

Under the old "first-come, first-served" system, which project would be ahead in the queue and why? What problem does this create?

Under the new "gated" reform, what is likely to happen to each project's position in the queue?

Show answer

Under the old system, Project A would be ahead in the queue simply because it applied first. The grid operator would have to reserve capacity and plan potential upgrades for Project A, delaying the connection of the viable Project B, even though Project A might never be built.

Under the new reform, Project A would likely fail to meet the Gate 2 milestone criteria (no land rights). It would lose its queue position. In contrast, Project B, being "shovel-ready", would easily pass Gate 2 and would likely have its connection date accelerated, jumping ahead of the non-viable project.


Conclusion

The grid connection queue represents a significant inefficiency, acting as a major handbrake on the UK's deployment of new generation and storage.

Key Takeaways:

  • The UK has a massive queue of over 700 GW of projects waiting to connect to a grid that has a peak demand of only ~50 GW.
  • The key causes of the long delays are the outdated "first-come, first-served" model, the clogging of the queue by speculative "zombie" projects, and the long lead times for physical grid reinforcement.
  • A major reform is underway to replace the sequential queue with a "gated" process.
  • This new process requires projects to meet milestones (like securing land and planning permission) to progress, aiming to filter out non-viable projects and fast-track those that are "shovel-ready".

Preview of the next lesson:

The connection queue is a barrier to getting new resources built. But even as these new renewable projects connect, they introduce new operational challenges for the grid. In our next lesson, we will describe the key technical barriers to operating a decarbonized grid, including the problems of low inertia, system strength, and the network congestion we've already touched upon.