Skip to main content

Welcome to a Grasp lesson

Create a free account to keep studying and create your own study path.

Lesson 37

Solving Electrostatic Boundary-Value Problems with Poisson's and Laplace's Equations

Recommended resources

Hello! Let's dive into the next stage of our study of electrostatics.

In the last lesson, we developed a powerful tool: calculating the electric potential and field by directly integrating the contributions from continuous charge distributions. While fundamental, this method can lead to very complex integrals. Today, we'll develop a more elegant and powerful approach that leverages differential equations, which is central to a vast number of problems in physics and engineering.

The learning outcome for this lesson is to derive and solve Poisson's and Laplace's equations for electrostatic boundary-value problems. We will see how these equations govern the behavior of the electric potential and learn standard techniques to solve them for specific physical situations.

1. The Differential Equations of the Electrostatic Potential

Our entire theory of electrostatics rests on two fundamental differential laws you've seen before:

  1. Gauss's Law (differential form):
  2. The Conservative Nature of : , which implies

By combining these two laws, we can derive a single master equation for the scalar potential . This is a cornerstone of potential theory.

Laplace's and Poisson's Equation for Electrostatic Potential

The following video provides a concise and rigorous derivation of this master equation.

Watch from 09:52 to 13:51. The first part (until 12:34) shows how substituting \mathbf{E} = -\nabla V into Gauss's Law leads directly to Poisson's equation. The second part (12:34 to 13:51) introduces its important special case, Laplace's equation.

As you saw in the video, substituting into gives:

This leads to Poisson's equation:

Here, (del-squared) is the Laplacian operator. In Cartesian coordinates, it is .

In a region of space where there are no free charges (), Poisson's equation simplifies to Laplace's equation:

Laplace's equation is particularly important because it governs the potential in the vast empty spaces between and around conductors, which are often held at fixed potentials. This setup defines what we call a boundary-value problem: we know the value of the potential on the surfaces of a region (the "boundary conditions") and we want to find everywhere inside that region.

ELECTROSTATIC BOUNDARY- VALUE PROBLEMS

To see the form of these equations in all three major coordinate systems, which is essential for problem-solving, please refer to this section from the textbook by Sadiku.

Read section 6.2, "POISSON'S AND LAPLACE'S EQUATIONS" (pages 199-200). Pay attention to equations 6.6, 6.7, and 6.8, which give the form of the Laplacian in Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates, respectively.


2. Uniqueness and Properties of Solutions

Before we start solving these equations, a crucial theoretical question arises: if we find a solution that satisfies the boundary conditions, is it the only possible solution? The answer is yes, and this is guaranteed by the Uniqueness Theorem.

This theorem is what makes boundary-value problems so powerful. It tells us that if we can find a solution by any method—no matter how strange—and it fits the boundary conditions, it is the correct and only solution.

ELECTROSTATIC BOUNDARY- VALUE PROBLEMS

The proof of the uniqueness theorem is an elegant piece of vector calculus and is a perfect example of the mathematical rigor you're interested in.

Read section 6.3, "UNIQUENESS THEOREM" (pages 201-202). Follow the logic of the proof by contradiction: assume two different solutions V_1 and V_2, define their difference V_d = V_2 - V_1, and show that the energy associated with V_d must be zero, forcing V_d=0.

Another key property of solutions to Laplace's equation is that they have no local maxima or minima. The extreme values of the potential must occur on the boundaries of the region.

Mod-02 Lec-14 Solutions of Laplace Equation

This video provides an excellent intuition for this 'no extrema' property and one of its profound physical consequences.

Watch from 04:34 to 11:13. The video illustrates that while a Poisson's equation solution can have a minimum (like a cup), a Laplace's equation solution can only have a 'saddle point'. This leads directly to Earnshaw's Theorem, which states that it's impossible to hold a charged particle in stable equilibrium using only electrostatic forces.


3. Solving 1D Boundary-Value Problems

The simplest boundary-value problems are those where symmetry dictates that the potential only varies with one coordinate (e.g., , , or ). In these cases, the partial differential equation (PDE) becomes a simple ordinary differential equation (ODE) that you can solve by direct integration.

The general procedure is:

  1. Solve the ODE to get a general solution with integration constants (e.g., A and B).
  2. Apply the given boundary conditions to determine the values of these constants.
  3. Use to find the electric field.

Let's look at some examples from the Sadiku textbook.

Example 1: Cartesian Coordinates (An Engineering Application)

Consider the model of an electrohydrodynamic (EHD) pump. This is a real-world device where an electric field is used to pump fluids.

Electrostatic Boundary Value Problem in an X-ray Square Tube
This image shows a similar setup to an EHD pump: two parallel electrodes with a uniform charge density between them. This is a 1D Poisson's equation problem.

ELECTROSTATIC BOUNDARY- VALUE PROBLEMS

The following example from the Sadiku text solves this exact problem.

Read Example 6.1 (pages 203-204). See how Poisson's equation \nabla^2V = -\rho_0/\epsilon reduces to d^2V/dz^2 = -\rho_0/\epsilon. Follow the two integration steps to get V(z) and see how the boundary conditions V(0)=V_0 and V(d)=0 are used to find the constants.

Example 2: Spherical Coordinates

Now consider two conducting cones held at different potentials. The symmetry suggests that the potential depends only on the polar angle .

Electrostatic Boundary-Value Problem: Potential Between Conducting Cones
This figure illustrates a typical boundary-value problem in spherical coordinates, where the potential depends only on the angle \(\theta\). Laplace's equation for \(V(\theta)\) is solved to find the potential in the region between the cones.

ELECTROSTATIC BOUNDARY- VALUE PROBLEMS

Example 6.4 from the Sadiku text solves this problem.

Read Example 6.4 (pages 208-210). Notice how Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates simplifies to ( rac{d}{d heta} \left(\sin heta rac{dV}{d heta} ight) = 0 ) when V depends only on heta. The solution involves a slightly trickier integral, resulting in a logarithmic dependence on \tan( heta/2).


4. Solving 2D Problems: The Method of Separation of Variables

When the potential depends on more than one variable, we can't just integrate directly. The most important analytical technique for solving Laplace's equation is the method of separation of variables. The core idea is to assume the solution is a product of functions, each depending on only one variable: for instance, . This assumption converts the single PDE into a set of simpler ODEs.

Let's see this in action with a classic example: a rectangular trough with three grounded sides and one side held at a constant potential .

ELECTROSTATIC BOUNDARY- VALUE PROBLEMS

Example 6.5 in the Sadiku text provides a detailed, step-by-step masterclass on the method of separation of variables. This is a crucial technique to master.

Read Example 6.5 (pages 211-218) carefully. This is the longest and most important reading in this lesson. Focus on these steps: Separation: How assuming V(x,y) = X(x)Y(y) turns Laplace's equation into two ODEs, X''/X = -Y''/Y = ext{constant}. Solving the ODEs: How the choice of the separation constant's sign is dictated by the boundary conditions, leading to sinusoidal solutions in x and hyperbolic sine solutions in y. Superposition: Since any solution V_n is valid, the general solution is a sum of all of them: a Fourier series. Applying the Final Boundary Condition: How the orthogonality of sine functions is used to find the coefficients of the Fourier series.

This method is extremely general. The same process is used in cylindrical or spherical coordinates, though the resulting ODEs (like Bessel's equation or Legendre's equation) and their solutions (special functions) are more complex. The NPTEL video LINK you looked at earlier shows the derivation for spherical coordinates, leading to Legendre Polynomials, which are essential in many areas of advanced physics.

Test your understanding!

In the rectangular trough problem, the solution for the potential was a Fourier series of sine and hyperbolic sine functions:

Why does the solution involve sinh(y) functions instead of sin(y) functions? (Hint: Think about the boundary conditions along the y-direction versus the x-direction).

Show answer

The choice between sinusoidal and exponential/hyperbolic solutions depends on the boundary conditions for that variable.

  • Along the x-direction: The potential is zero at and . A sine function, , naturally satisfies these two "zero" boundary conditions at its ends. An exponential or hyperbolic function cannot be zero at two different points (unless it's identically zero).
  • Along the y-direction: The potential is zero at but is non-zero () at . A linear combination of hyperbolic sine and cosine, like , is needed. The condition forces , leaving just the term, which is zero at but not at . A sine function could not satisfy this.

Conclusion

Today, we've transitioned from solving electrostatic problems with integration to solving them with partial differential equations. This is a significant step up in sophistication and power.

Key Takeaways:

  • Combining Gauss's Law with gives Poisson's equation () and Laplace's equation ().
  • These equations, along with specified boundary conditions, form a boundary-value problem.
  • The Uniqueness Theorem guarantees that if we find one solution to a boundary-value problem, it is the only one.
  • Solutions to Laplace's equation are "smooth" and have their maximum and minimum values on the boundary, not in the interior.
  • 1D problems can be solved by direct integration of the corresponding ODE.
  • Higher-dimensional problems are typically solved with the method of separation of variables, which transforms the PDE into a set of ODEs and often results in a Fourier series solution.

Preview of the Next Lesson:
In our next lesson, we will focus on the behavior of conductors in electrostatic equilibrium. We will see that the entire volume of a conductor is an equipotential region, which provides a powerful boundary condition for solving Laplace's equation. This will also allow us to formally define capacitance and justify an elegant problem-solving shortcut called the method of images, whose validity rests on the uniqueness theorem you learned today.