Skip to main content

Welcome to a Grasp lesson

Create a free account to keep studying and create your own study path.

Lesson 55

Privatisation by Disinvestment: Objectives and Mechanisms

Recommended resources

Welcome to our next lesson on the economic reforms of 1991. In our last session, we delved into Liberalisation, the first major pillar of the New Economic Policy, and saw how it freed the Indian economy from the restrictive "License Raj." We discussed the reforms in the industrial, financial, and tax sectors that paved the way for a more market-driven environment.

Today, we move on to the second pillar of the LPG reforms: Privatisation. This lesson will explain what privatisation is, how it was primarily carried out in India through disinvestment, and what the government aimed to achieve with this policy. Understanding this is crucial, as it marks a fundamental shift in the government's role from being a primary producer of goods and services to a facilitator of economic activity.

1. What is Privatisation?

At its simplest, privatisation is the process of transferring the ownership and management of government-owned enterprises (known as Public Sector Enterprises or PSEs) to the private sector. Before 1991, the public sector dominated many areas of the economy, but many PSEs were inefficient and incurred heavy losses, becoming a burden on the government's finances. Privatisation was introduced to address this.

The official NCERT textbook provides the core definition.

[PDF] D:\Textbooks\Rationalised Books\11100 - NCERT

This section from your official textbook defines privatisation and introduces its primary method, disinvestment. It's the foundational definition you should know for your exam.

Read the section titled PRIVATISATION. Focus on how it defines the term and lists the two ways government companies are converted into private ones. Crucially, note how it defines disinvestment.

As the textbook states, privatisation can happen in two main ways:

  1. Withdrawal of government ownership and management: This is a gradual process where the government reduces its control.
  2. Outright sale of public sector companies: The entire company is sold to a private entity.

In India, the most common route for privatisation has been disinvestment. This means the government sells off a portion of its shares (equity) in a PSE. If it sells a small portion, it's just raising funds. If it sells more than 51% of the shares, it also transfers management control to the private buyer.

The following infographic provides an excellent visual summary of the different forms privatisation can take, clearly showing disinvestment as a key method.

This infographic illustrates five different methods of privatisation used in India, including disinvestment, strategic sale, and public-private partnerships (PPPs).

2. Distinguishing Privatisation and Disinvestment

It's common to get confused between these two terms, but the relationship is straightforward: disinvestment is a tool used to achieve privatisation.

  • Privatisation is the broad objective of increasing private sector participation.
  • Disinvestment is the specific action of selling government shares in PSEs.

The video below explains this relationship clearly.

GNG Economics | Day 21 | Chapter 3 | New economic policy 1991

Rajat Arora, whose videos we used in the last lesson, provides a simple, exam-focused explanation of privatisation and disinvestment.

Watch the segment from Privatisation explained. Pay close attention to how he defines privatisation and then explains that it can be done through two methods: transferring ownership completely or through disinvestment (selling off equity).

To solidify the distinction, the table in the following resource is very helpful for a quick comparison.

Difference between Privatization and Disinvestment - Testbook

This resource from Testbook provides a direct comparison that clarifies the nuances between the two concepts.

Focus on the comparison table. Note the key difference in their primary objectives: privatisation aims to improve efficiency, while disinvestment is often used to raise government revenue.


3. The Objectives of Disinvestment

Now that we understand what privatisation and disinvestment are, let's address the second part of our learning outcome: Why did the government adopt this policy? The objectives go beyond simply selling off companies.

The NCERT textbook mentions the core goals were to "improve financial discipline and facilitate modernisation." A more detailed breakdown of the objectives is provided in the following video.

Disinvestment & Privatization policy in India Explained | Why Govt does it | Flowchart explanation

This video from Amit Sengupta offers a comprehensive list of the reasons and objectives behind the government's disinvestment policy.

Watch the section from Objectives of Disinvestment. As you watch, try to list down the different objectives mentioned.

Based on the video and your textbook, the main objectives of privatisation and disinvestment can be summarised as:

  • Improving the Performance of PSEs: To bring in private sector efficiency, technology, and management practices to improve the performance of inefficient, loss-making public sector units.
  • Raising Financial Resources: To generate funds for the government. These funds can be used to reduce the fiscal deficit, finance social sector schemes (like health and education), or invest in infrastructure.
  • Introducing Competition and Breaking Monopolies: Selling PSEs in sectors like telecommunications opened the market to private players, leading to increased competition, lower prices, and better services for consumers.
  • Facilitating Modernisation: To attract private capital and technical expertise needed to modernise and upgrade PSEs, which the government often could not afford to do on its own.
  • Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Selling stakes in Indian companies to foreign entities was a way to attract foreign capital and integrate with the global economy.
  • Reducing the Government's Administrative Burden: Privatisation allows the government to focus on its core functions of governance and regulation rather than running commercial businesses.

4. A Brief Critical Evaluation

While privatisation has been a cornerstone of India's reforms, it has not been without criticism. For a balanced answer in your exam, it's useful to be aware of the main arguments against it.

Critics often point out two major issues:

  1. Undervaluation of Assets: It is alleged that the government has sometimes sold its stake in valuable PSEs at a price lower than their actual worth, causing a loss to the public exchequer.
  2. Use of Proceeds: The money raised from disinvestment has often been used to plug short-term budget gaps (revenue deficits) rather than being invested in building new infrastructure or revitalising other PSEs for long-term development.

These points are briefly mentioned in your NCERT textbook in the "An Appraisal" section of the chapter.


Conclusion

In this lesson, we have explored the second pillar of the 1991 reforms, Privatisation. We've established its meaning and examined how it was implemented primarily through disinvestment.

Key Takeaways:

  • Privatisation refers to the transfer of ownership and management of public sector enterprises (PSEs) to the private sector.
  • Disinvestment is the main method used for privatisation in India, involving the sale of the government's shares in PSEs.
  • The primary objectives of this policy were to improve the financial discipline and efficiency of PSEs, raise resources for the government, and introduce competition into the economy.
  • The policy has been criticised for the potential undervaluation of public assets and the use of proceeds for short-term needs rather than long-term investment.

With liberalisation and privatisation covered, we are now ready to tackle the third and final pillar of the reforms. Our next lesson will focus on Globalisation, explaining how India opened its doors to the rest of the world and the impact this had on the economy.