Hello! Welcome back to our study of non-Abelian gauge theories.
In our last lesson, we took the crucial first step in generalizing QED to theories like QCD. We started with a global SU(N) symmetry, promoted it to a local one, and found that this required two new ingredients:
- A covariant derivative , where is the Lie-algebra valued gauge potential.
- A field strength tensor , which transforms covariantly in the adjoint representation: .
We now have all the pieces needed to describe the dynamics of the gauge fields themselves. Today, we will use the field strength tensor to construct the Lagrangian for these fields. This will lead us to one of the most important results in modern physics: the Yang-Mills Lagrangian.
Our learning outcome is to write the Yang-Mills Lagrangian and identify the gauge boson self-interaction terms. This will reveal a profound difference between the force carriers of QED (photons) and those of non-Abelian theories (like gluons).
Constructing the Yang-Mills Lagrangian
Our goal is to build a kinetic term for the gauge fields, , that is both Lorentz invariant and gauge invariant. We have the field strength tensor , which is an anti-symmetric Lorentz tensor and transforms covariantly under a gauge transformation.
How can we construct a quantity that is a Lorentz scalar and also a gauge singlet (i.e., fully invariant) from ?
- Lorentz Invariance: The simplest Lorentz scalar we can form is the contraction .
- Gauge Invariance: However, this quantity is still a matrix in the Lie algebra. Under a gauge transformation, it transforms as: This is not yet gauge invariant. To get a scalar number from this matrix that is invariant under such a "similarity transformation," we can take the trace. The cyclic property of the trace () is the key: We have found our gauge-invariant and Lorentz-invariant object! We can now define the Yang-Mills Lagrangian.
The following video segment lucidly explains this final step of the construction.
Deriving Yang-Mills Theory And Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) | Quantum Field Theory
This video from Dietterich Labs follows the exact logic we just outlined, showing how squaring and tracing the field strength tensor produces the unique, physically consistent Lagrangian for the gauge fields.
Watch from 16:55 to 19:12. Pay close attention to the argument for why taking the trace is necessary for non-Abelian theories (unlike in QED) and the statement about the uniqueness of the resulting Lagrangian.
As shown in the video, the standard form of the Yang-Mills Lagrangian is:
The factor of is a convention, which we'll discuss later. Using the normalization for the SU(N) generators, , this can be rewritten in component form:
By absorbing the coupling constant into the fields (), we can write the Lagrangian in the form you will most often see:
where the field strength is now defined as . This form makes the role of as a coupling strength for the interaction vertices more apparent.
For a more formal and detailed presentation of this construction, the following text is an excellent resource.
6 Gauge Symmetries: Yang–Mills and Gravity
These lecture notes by Pierre Ramond provide a rigorous derivation of the Yang-Mills Lagrangian, starting from the commutator of covariant derivatives.
Read from the paragraph starting 'Consider the Hermitean quantity F_μν' (page 15, Eq. 6.80) to the end of the section on page 16 (before Eq. 6.97). This section derives the field strength from the covariant derivative commutator and uses it to construct the Lagrangian (Eq. 6.88), providing a formal justification for its structure.
Unveiling the Gauge Boson Self-Interactions
The compact form hides a wealth of physics. Let's reveal it by substituting the full expression for :
Expanding this product reveals terms with different powers of the gauge field :
-
Quadratic Terms ():
This part looks just like a sum of copies of the Maxwell Lagrangian. It is the kinetic term for the free propagation of the gauge bosons. -
Cubic Terms ():
This term involves three gauge fields. It is an interaction term. In the language of Feynman diagrams, this corresponds to a vertex where three gauge bosons meet. -
Quartic Terms ():
This term involves four gauge fields and describes a four-gauge-boson interaction vertex.
The Ramond notes provide the explicit expansion of the Lagrangian, clearly showing these terms.
6 Gauge Symmetries: Yang–Mills and Gravity
Let's now study the expanded form of the Lagrangian to explicitly see the self-interaction terms.
Focus on Section 6.3, 'The Pure Yang-Mills Theory'. Equations 6.102 and 6.103 show the Lagrangian in component form. Equation 6.105 explicitly expands the Lagrangian, identifying the kinetic, cubic, and quartic terms. This directly addresses the main goal of our lesson.
This is a monumental result. Unlike photons in QED, which do not interact with each other (the Maxwell Lagrangian is purely quadratic in ), the gauge bosons of a non-Abelian theory like QCD (the gluons) do interact with themselves. This self-interaction is a direct consequence of the non-zero commutator in the field strength tensor, rooted in the non-Abelian nature of the symmetry group. These interactions are responsible for many of the unique properties of the strong force, such as asymptotic freedom and confinement.
The image below provides a powerful visual summary, connecting the terms in the QCD Lagrangian directly to the Feynman rules for gluon propagators and their self-interaction vertices.

Test your understanding!
Starting from the Yang-Mills Lagrangian in component form, with :
- Explicitly write out the term in the Lagrangian that is cubic in the gauge field .
- Based on this term, what are the essential ingredients for a 3-gauge-boson interaction vertex to be non-zero?
Show answer
-
The cubic term arises from the cross-product of the part and the part of . There are two such products, which are identical:
Combining these gives:
-
For this vertex to be non-zero, two conditions must be met:
- The coupling constant must be non-zero.
- The structure constants must be non-zero. This is true for any non-Abelian Lie group, but would be zero for an Abelian group like U(1), which is why photons do not have a 3-particle self-interaction vertex.
Conclusion
In this lesson, we have constructed the dynamical Lagrangian for non-Abelian gauge fields and uncovered its profound physical meaning.
Key Takeaways:
- The Yang-Mills Lagrangian, , is the unique gauge-invariant and Lorentz-invariant kinetic term for SU(N) gauge fields that leads to a unitary quantum theory.
- Gauge invariance of the Lagrangian is guaranteed by the structure of the field strength tensor and the cyclic property of the trace.
- Expanding the Lagrangian reveals not only a standard kinetic term (quadratic in ), but also cubic and quartic self-interaction terms.
- These self-interactions are a hallmark of non-Abelian theories and mean that the force carriers (like gluons) interact with each other. This is fundamentally different from QED, where photons do not self-interact.
Preview of the Next Lesson:
We now have the Lagrangian for the matter fields (from the previous lesson) and the Lagrangian for the gauge fields. In the next lesson, we will put them together to formulate the complete Lagrangian for Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), the theory of the strong nuclear force. We will introduce the concept of "color charge" and see how quarks (the matter fields) interact via the exchange of gluons (the gauge fields).