Skip to main content
Back to path

Welcome to a Grasp lesson

Create a free account to keep studying and create your own study path.

Lesson 25

Comparing Regularized Regression Models

Recommended resources

In our previous lesson, we put theory into practice by applying Ridge and Lasso regression using scikit-learn. You saw how these models shrink coefficients to prevent overfitting and how Lasso can perform feature selection. This hands-on experience has set the stage for our final step in exploring regularized linear models.

Today, we will complete this module by focusing on Elastic Net, the hybrid model that combines the strengths of both Ridge and Lasso. You will learn how to apply it, tune its unique set of hyperparameters, and, most importantly, conduct a comprehensive comparison of its performance against the other linear models we've covered: standard OLS, Ridge, and Lasso. This will solidify your ability to choose the right tool for the right regression problem.

Applying and Tuning Elastic Net

Elastic Net introduces a second key hyperparameter: l1_ratio. This parameter controls the mix between the L1 (Lasso) and L2 (Ridge) penalties, while the alpha parameter continues to control the overall strength of regularization. Because we have two parameters to tune, we'll use a technique called Grid Search with Cross-Validation (GridSearchCV) to systematically find the optimal combination.

The following video provides an excellent, practical walkthrough of this entire process, from fitting a basic Elastic Net model to tuning it for better performance.

Elastic Net Regression in scikit-learn Balancing L1 and L2 Optimizations

This video by Ryan & Matt Data Science covers the end-to-end process of applying and tuning Elastic Net regression in scikit-learn.

Please watch the video in segments: Introduction and Data Prep from the start: The video begins with a quick recap of L1/L2 regularization and then dives into preparing the 'tips' dataset. Pay attention to the use of pd.get_dummies for one-hot encoding and StandardScaler for feature scaling. These are essential preprocessing steps you've seen before. Basic Elastic Net to this point: Here, a default ElasticNet model is trained and evaluated. Notice the initial performance metrics (MAE, MSE, and R2 score). This serves as our baseline before tuning. Hyperparameter Tuning with GridSearchCV until the end: This is the core of the practical exercise. Observe how a param_grid is created for both alpha and l1_ratio. The video then uses GridSearchCV to test all combinations and find the best model. Compare the final evaluation metrics to the baseline to see the significant improvement achieved through tuning.

As you saw in the video, tuning both alpha and l1_ratio allowed the GridSearchCV to find a model that performed significantly better than the default. An l1_ratio of 1.0 makes the model equivalent to Lasso, while a ratio of 0.0 would make it equivalent to Ridge (though scikit-learn uses a small epsilon to avoid technical issues). Values in between create a true hybrid.

A Four-Way Model Comparison

Now that you've applied OLS, Ridge, Lasso, and Elastic Net, we can perform a final comparison. How do they stack up against each other on the same dataset? The following resource uses a prostate cancer dataset to do just that, running all four models and comparing their coefficients and performance.

From Linear Regression to Ridge Regression, the Lasso, and the ...

This article provides a concise yet thorough comparison of the four linear regression models we have studied. We'll focus on the final results where everything is brought together.

Start by reading the section on The Elastic Net, which introduces the model and its two parameters. Then, focus on the section Putting it together. This is the most important part. Carefully examine the final comparison table, which shows the coefficients and test set MSE for all four models.

The table you just reviewed is a perfect summary of this module. Let's analyze its findings:

  • OLS (Least Squares): Performed the worst on the test data. Its coefficients are unconstrained, making it prone to overfitting.
  • Ridge: Performed better than OLS. Notice how its coefficients are all smaller in magnitude than the OLS coefficients—this is the "shrinkage" effect of the L2 penalty.
  • Lasso: Performed even better. Crucially, it set the coefficients for lcp, gleason, and age to zero, effectively performing feature selection.
  • Elastic Net: Achieved the best performance (lowest MSE). Like Lasso, it removed the same features, but by balancing the L1 and L2 penalties, it found a slightly better solution than Lasso alone.

This outcome, where Elastic Net provides a marginal or significant improvement, is common in practice. It offers the most flexibility, though at the cost of a more complex tuning process.

This image offers a simple visual comparison of the regression lines produced by each model.

A visual comparison of the regression lines and objective functions for Linear Regression, Ridge, Lasso, and Elastic Net on a simple 2D dataset. Each model finds a slightly different slope based on its unique penalty.

Final Guidance: When to Use Which Model?

Your goal is not just to know how to apply these models, but when. Based on everything we've covered, we can establish a practical decision-making framework.

A recap of the geometric interpretation of L1 (Lasso), L2 (Ridge), and Elastic Net penalties. The shape of the constraint region determines how the model finds its optimal coefficients.

Here is a strategic guide for choosing your model:

  1. Start with a Simple Baseline: Ordinary Least Squares (LinearRegression) is a great starting point, especially if you have more observations than features and your features are not highly correlated. If it performs well and its assumptions are met, you may not need regularization. Ridge regression is also a robust starting point, as it is more stable than OLS in the presence of multicollinearity.

  2. Use Lasso for Sparsity and Feature Selection: If you have a large number of features and suspect many are irrelevant, Lasso is an excellent choice. Its ability to produce sparse models (with zeroed-out coefficients) makes it a tool for both prediction and feature selection, leading to more interpretable models.

  3. Use Ridge for High Multicollinearity: If your features are highly correlated, Lasso might arbitrarily select one feature from a group and discard the others. Ridge is often more stable in this scenario, as it shrinks the coefficients of correlated features together rather than eliminating them.

  4. Use Elastic Net as the Robust Hybrid: When you have correlated features and you suspect some features are irrelevant, ElasticNet is the ideal choice. It can create a sparse model like Lasso but maintains the grouping behavior of Ridge for correlated predictors. It's often the best performer when you're unsure or when Ridge and Lasso alone give unsatisfactory results. A good practice is to try Ridge or Lasso first, and if they don't perform well, move on to Elastic Net.

Conclusion

In this lesson, you successfully applied and tuned Elastic Net regression, completing your tour of regularized linear models. You then synthesized your knowledge by comparing the performance and coefficient behavior of all four linear models we have studied.

Key Takeaways:

  • Elastic Net combines L1 and L2 penalties, controlled by the alpha (strength) and l1_ratio (mix) hyperparameters.
  • GridSearchCV is a powerful tool for systematically tuning multiple hyperparameters to find the best model configuration.
  • Comparing OLS, Ridge, Lasso, and Elastic Net reveals a clear trade-off between model simplicity, interpretability, and predictive power.
  • The choice of model should be strategic: start simple, use Lasso for feature selection, Ridge for multicollinearity, and Elastic Net as a powerful, robust hybrid.

You have now mastered a crucial set of fundamental regression algorithms. In our next lesson, we will pivot from regression to classification. We'll start with Logistic Regression, exploring how we can adapt linear models to predict categorical outcomes rather than continuous values.