Introduction
Welcome back! In our previous lesson, we established a precise vocabulary for discussing the convergence of random variables, distinguishing between almost sure convergence, convergence in probability, and convergence in distribution. We saw that convergence in probability, , means that the likelihood of being far from vanishes as grows.
Today, we will apply this concept to one of the most fundamental theorems in all of statistics: the Weak Law of Large Numbers (WLLN). This theorem provides the formal justification for a practice you are very familiar with from experimental science: using the average of many measurements to estimate a true underlying quantity. We will state the theorem, prove it under a simple set of conditions, and then explore a more general version that highlights the power of this result.
The Weak Law of Large Numbers
At its heart, the WLLN states that the sample mean of a large number of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables is very likely to be close to the true mean of the distribution. It formalizes the idea that averaging reduces uncertainty and stabilizes around a true value.
To see a full derivation and explanation of the most common form of the WLLN, please watch the following video. It is a concise and self-contained presentation that walks through the setup, the proof, and the interpretation.
L18.4 The Weak Law of Large Numbers
This video from MIT OpenCourseWare provides a complete derivation of the Weak Law of Large Numbers for the case where the random variables have a finite mean and variance.
Please watch the entire video (about 7.5 minutes). Pay close attention to these steps: The setup: defining the sample mean from i.i.d. random variables. The calculation of the expectation and variance of the sample mean. The application of Chebyshev's inequality to prove the main result. The interpretation of the law, especially the connection to empirical frequencies.
Unpacking the Proof
As you saw in the video, the proof is an elegant application of concepts you already know. Let's formalize the statement and the steps.
Statement of the WLLN (with finite variance)
Let be a sequence of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables with a finite mean and a finite variance . Let the sample mean be denoted by .
Then, for any positive number , the sample mean converges in probability to the true mean :
Or, using the notation from our last lesson, .
The Proof, Step-by-Step
The proof rests on three key calculations:
-
Expectation of the Sample Mean: By linearity of expectation, the sample mean is an unbiased estimator of .
-
Variance of the Sample Mean: This is the crucial step. Because the variables are independent, the variance of the sum is the sum of the variances.
This result shows that the variance of the sample mean shrinks as the sample size increases. This inverse relationship should be very familiar from analyzing statistical errors in experimental physics, where the standard error of the mean decreases with the square root of the number of measurements.
-
Application of Chebyshev's Inequality: In the previous lesson, we discussed Chebyshev's inequality, which bounds the probability of a random variable deviating from its mean. For any random variable with mean and variance , and for any :
Applying this to our sample mean , where , , and :
As we take the limit , the right-hand side goes to zero for any fixed , which completes the proof.
A More General and Powerful Result
The proof above is straightforward, but it relies on the condition of finite variance (). This excludes many "heavy-tailed" distributions that appear in various physical and economic models, such as certain Pareto distributions which may have a finite mean but infinite variance.
A more powerful version of the WLLN, often called Khinchin's Weak Law of Large Numbers, relaxes this requirement. It states that the law holds as long as the mean is finite (), even if the variance is infinite.
The proof is more involved and typically uses one of two advanced techniques:
- Truncation: The random variables are split into a "well-behaved" part (by cutting off the tails) and a "tail" part. Chebyshev's inequality is applied to the well-behaved part, and the probability of the tail part is shown to be negligible.
- Characteristic Functions: This method uses the fact that convergence in distribution is equivalent to the pointwise convergence of characteristic functions (a result from Lévy's continuity theorem). Since convergence in probability to a constant is equivalent to convergence in distribution, one can prove the WLLN by showing that the characteristic function of converges to the characteristic function of the constant . This approach leverages tools analogous to Fourier analysis.
To see a more formal statement of this general law and the truncation technique, please review the following notes.
[PDF] Notes 4 : Laws of large numbers
The version of the WLLN we just proved is sometimes called the 'L2 WLLN' because it relies on a finite second moment (variance). The more general 'L1 WLLN' only requires a finite first moment (mean). These notes from UW-Madison formalize this stronger result and outline the proof via truncation.
Please read the following two sections from Sébastien Roch's notes: Section 2 'Weak laws': Start from 'THM 4.4 (Weak law of large numbers)'. This states the general necessary and sufficient condition. Then focus on 'COR 4.5 (L1 weak law)', which is Khinchin's theorem. Section 2.1 'Truncation': Read the first paragraph and 'THM 4.8 (Weak law for triangular arrays)'. You don't need to follow every line of the proof, but focus on the strategy: the random variable is split into two parts, one bounded (to which Chebyshev can be applied) and a tail (whose probability is controlled).
This more general result is a testament to the robustness of the law of large numbers. It asserts that the stabilizing effect of averaging is a very fundamental property, not just an artifact of distributions with well-behaved variances.
Conclusion
In this lesson, we have formally defined and proven the Weak Law of Large Numbers, connecting it to the concept of convergence in probability.
Key Takeaways:
- The Weak Law of Large Numbers states that the sample mean of i.i.d. random variables converges in probability to the true population mean .
- It provides the rigorous mathematical foundation for the common practice of using sample averages to estimate unknown parameters.
- A simple proof exists if the variance is finite, relying on the fact that .
- A more general version of the WLLN holds even if the variance is infinite, as long as the mean is finite. This underscores the broad applicability of the principle.
The WLLN is a statement about probabilities for a fixed, large . It tells us that the probability of a large error is small, but it doesn't preclude the possibility that large errors, however improbable, might occur infinitely often as increases. To make a stronger claim about the limiting behavior of the entire sequence of sample means, we need a stronger mode of convergence.
Preview of the Next Lesson:
We will move on to the Strong Law of Large Numbers (SLLN). This theorem strengthens the WLLN by using almost sure convergence, stating that for almost every sequence of outcomes, the sample mean will eventually converge to and stay at the true mean. This will complete our study of the two fundamental Laws of Large Numbers.