Skip to main content

Welcome to a Grasp lesson

Create a free account to keep studying and create your own study path.

Lesson 1

Smooth Manifolds: Charts, Atlases, and the n-Sphere

Recommended resources

Hello! Welcome to the first lesson in our course on General Relativity and Cosmology.

Our journey begins not with physics, but with the mathematical language needed to describe it. The stage upon which General Relativity plays out is a concept called spacetime, and to understand its curved, dynamic nature, we first need to understand the mathematical objects that can model it. This is where the idea of a smooth manifold comes in.

In your previous studies in mechanics and electromagnetism, you've worked primarily within the familiar framework of Euclidean space, . Manifolds are a powerful generalization of this. They are spaces that might be globally curved or twisted in complex ways (like a sphere or a torus), but which, if you zoom in on any small patch, look just like a flat piece of Euclidean space.

Today, we will build a precise definition of a smooth manifold. We will achieve this by covering our space with local "coordinate patches" called charts and collecting them into an atlas. We will then see that the "smoothness" of the manifold is encoded in how these different coordinate patches relate to one another. Finally, we'll apply these definitions to a key example: the n-sphere.

1. The Intuitive Idea: Locally Euclidean Spaces

Before diving into formal definitions, let's build some intuition. The core idea of a manifold is that it's a space where every point has a neighborhood that is "topologically equivalent" to an open disk in Euclidean space. "Topologically equivalent" (the technical term is homeomorphic) means you can continuously deform one into the other without cutting or gluing.

The surface of the Earth is a classic example. Globally, it's a curved sphere, but any small region (like your city) can be mapped onto a flat piece of paper (a map) without gross distortion.

Manifold - First Glimpse: Local Euclidean Property
This image illustrates the core concept. On the left, a 2D manifold: any small piece of its surface can be 'flattened' into a disk in \(\mathbb{R}^2\). On the right, a double cone is a non-manifold because the neighborhood around the central point cannot be flattened into a disk without tearing.

This "locally Euclidean" property is what will allow us to eventually do calculus on these more general spaces.

To formalize this, we start with the concept of a topological manifold. Please watch the first few minutes of the following lecture by Frederic Schuller, which introduces this idea.

Topological manifolds and manifold bundles- Lec 06 - Frederic Schuller

This video segment introduces the rough idea of a topological manifold and then presents its precise definition.

Watch the video from the beginning until 07:14. Focus on: The intuitive idea of a space that 'locally looks like some \mathbb{R}^D.' The formal definition, which involves three key components: a topological space that is Hausdorff and paracompact, and for which every point has a neighborhood that is homeomorphic to a subset of \mathbb{R}^D.

Let's unpack the technical conditions mentioned in the video:

  • Hausdorff: Any two distinct points can be separated by disjoint open sets. This is a "sanity check" condition that prevents pathological spaces where points are "indistinguishable." All familiar spaces like are Hausdorff.
  • Second-countable / Paracompact: These are related conditions that, roughly speaking, prevent the space from being "too big" or having "too many holes." They ensure we can use tools like integration and partitions of unity, which will be important later. The lecture notes from the University of Hamburg, "Differential Geometry," provide a concise definition of these prerequisites on pages 1-2 (Definition 1.2) if you'd like a text reference. You don't need to dwell on the deep topological implications now, but it's important to know they are part of the formal definition.

The most important part of the definition is the existence of a homeomorphism (a continuous map with a continuous inverse) from a neighborhood of any point in our space to an open set in . This is the mathematical embodiment of the "locally looks like " idea.


2. Making it Concrete: Charts, Atlases, and Transition Maps

The homeomorphisms that make a space a manifold are the tools we use to assign coordinates locally. We give them special names.

  • A chart is a pair , where is an open subset of the manifold , and is a homeomorphism onto its image, . The map is our "coordinate map." For a point , the vector gives the coordinates of in that chart.
  • An atlas is a collection of charts such that the open sets cover the entire manifold, i.e., .

Think of the atlas on the Earth again. Each page is a chart, providing coordinates (latitude and longitude) for a region. The whole book is an atlas, and together, the maps cover the entire globe.

Now, a crucial question arises: What happens in the regions where two maps overlap? A city like London might appear on a map of the UK and also on a map of Europe. It will have different coordinates on each map. We need a way to relate these coordinate systems to ensure consistency.

This is done via a transition map. If two charts, and , overlap on the manifold (), we can construct a map that goes from the coordinates in one chart to the coordinates in the other. The map

takes coordinates from chart and gives back the corresponding coordinates in chart . Notice that this is a map from an open subset of to another open subset of . This is a familiar object from multivariable calculus!

Two Charts on a Manifold with Change-of-Coordinates
This diagram shows two overlapping charts, \((U, x)\) and \((V, \bar{x})\), on a manifold \(M\). The transition map, labeled 'Change-of-Coordinates,' maps between the coordinate representations in \(\mathbb{E}^2\) (which is just \(\mathbb{R}^2\)).

The properties of these transition maps are what determine the type of manifold we are dealing with. The following extensive video segment explains this framework in detail.

Topological manifolds and manifold bundles- Lec 06 - Frederic Schuller

This segment from Frederic Schuller's lecture formally defines charts, coordinates, atlases, and the all-important transition maps. It also introduces the concept of a maximal atlas.

Please watch from 01:18:12 to 01:39:26. Pay close attention to the definitions of: Chart and coordinates. Atlas (and the intuition behind the name). C0-compatibility and the construction of the transition map (y \circ x^{-1}). Maximal atlas.

As the video notes, for a purely topological manifold, the transition maps are just continuous (C), which is guaranteed by the definition. To do differential calculus, we need more structure.


3. Adding Smoothness

The learning outcome is to define a smooth manifold. We are now ready to do so. The "smooth" property is endowed upon the manifold by placing a stronger requirement on the atlas.

A smooth atlas is an atlas where all transition maps, , are not just continuous, but are smooth (infinitely differentiable, or ).

Why is this so important? It guarantees that the notion of "differentiability" is consistent across the manifold. If we have a function on the manifold and we find that its coordinate representation in chart is differentiable, the smoothness of the transition map ensures that its representation in chart will also be differentiable. This allows us to define what a smooth function on a manifold is, without ambiguity.

A smooth manifold is formally defined as a second-countable, Hausdorff topological space equipped with a maximal smooth atlas.

  • The "maximal" part is a technical convenience. It means we consider the atlas to contain every possible chart that is smoothly compatible with the ones we started with. As explained in Lemma 1.10 of the "Differential Geometry" PDF (page 4), any smooth atlas uniquely determines a maximal one, so in practice, we only need to specify one valid smooth atlas to define the manifold's smooth structure.

[LINK](https://www.math.uni-hamburg.de/home/lindemann/material/dg_lindemann_ss2020_WIP14.pdf)

For a concise, formal definition of a smooth manifold and its components, please read the following excerpt from the 'Differential Geometry' lecture notes by Nils Lindemann.

Read pages 2-3, from Definition 1.4 to Definition 1.6. This text provides the formal definitions of an n-dimensional smooth atlas, compatible charts, and a smooth manifold.

Test your understanding!

Consider a 1D manifold (the real line). Let's define two charts:

  1. Chart 1: where and .
  2. Chart 2: where and .

Is the collection a smooth atlas for ?

Show answer

No, it is not a smooth atlas. To check this, we must check the smoothness of the transition maps.
The transition map from chart 1 to chart 2 is . If is a coordinate in chart 1, then . The coordinate in chart 2 is . The map is smooth ().

However, the transition map from chart 2 to chart 1 is . If is a coordinate in chart 2, then . The coordinate in chart 1 is . The map is not differentiable at . Therefore, it is not smooth, and the atlas is not a smooth atlas. This shows that with the standard coordinate defines a different smooth structure from the one you would get from the chart .


4. Example: The n-Sphere

Let's put this all together with a concrete example: the n-sphere, defined as the set of points in at unit distance from the origin:

We can show this is a smooth manifold by constructing a smooth atlas for it. An atlas with just two charts is sufficient. These charts are constructed using stereographic projection.

  1. Chart 1: Let be the "North Pole." Our first open set is . The chart map projects a point from the North Pole onto the equatorial hyperplane.
  2. Chart 2: Let be the "South Pole." Our second open set is . The chart map projects from the South Pole.

The following resource provides the explicit formulas for these maps and calculates the transition function to prove it is smooth.

[LINK](https://www.math.uni-hamburg.de/home/lindemann/material/dg_lindemann_ss2020_WIP14.pdf)

This section of the 'Differential Geometry' notes provides a clear and complete construction of the smooth manifold structure on the n-sphere, S^n.

Read Example 1.18 (i) on page 6. Follow the argument: The two charts cover the sphere. The explicit formulas for the chart maps \sigma_+ (our \sigma_N) and \sigma_- (our \sigma_S). The calculation of the transition map \sigma_+ \circ \sigma_-^{-1}. The confirmation that this map, x \mapsto x/\|x\|^2, is smooth on its domain, \mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\}.

The map is called an inversion. Its components involve rational functions whose denominators are never zero on the domain of the transition map (). Therefore, it is infinitely differentiable, the atlas is smooth, and is a smooth manifold.


Summary and Next Steps

Let's recap the key ideas from our first lesson.

  • A smooth manifold is a space that locally resembles Euclidean space . More formally, it is a second-countable, Hausdorff topological space.
  • We use charts to assign local coordinates to points on the manifold. A collection of charts that covers the whole space is an atlas.
  • The "smoothness" of the manifold is encoded in the requirement that the transition maps between any two overlapping charts must be infinitely differentiable ().
  • A smooth manifold is rigorously defined as a topological space equipped with a maximal smooth atlas.
  • We demonstrated that the n-sphere is a smooth manifold by constructing a smooth atlas for it using two stereographic projection charts.

You now have a foundational understanding of the "arena" in which general relativity is formulated. However, a stage is empty without actors. We need to be able to define physical quantities on the manifold, like velocities, forces, and fields.

In our next lesson, we will take the first step in this direction by constructing the tangent space at a point on a manifold. This will lead us to the concept of vector fields, which are the manifold's generalization of the vector functions you are familiar with from electromagnetism and fluid dynamics.