Hello! Welcome back to our exploration of quantum fields in curved spacetime.
In the last lesson, we reached a pivotal conclusion: the concept of a "particle" is not absolute but depends on the observer. We saw that without the global time-translation symmetry guaranteed by a timelike Killing vector, there is no unique way to split field solutions into positive and negative frequency parts. This led to the startling idea that the vacuum state for one observer, , might appear full of particles to another, . The number of particles measured by Bob in a specific mode of Alice's vacuum was found to be .
Today, we will put this on a firm mathematical footing. Our goal is to formally define the Bogoliubov transformations that connect these different descriptions and to understand their properties. We will derive the relationship between different sets of creation and annihilation operators and uncover the constraints these transformations must satisfy to preserve the structure of quantum mechanics.
1. The General Transformation of Modes and Operators
Let's formalize the setup from our last discussion. We have a scalar field that satisfies the Klein-Gordon equation in a curved spacetime.
-
An observer, "Alice," chooses a complete orthonormal basis of solutions to define her notion of particles. She decomposes the field operator as:
Her vacuum, , is defined by for all . -
Another observer, "Bob," chooses a different complete orthonormal basis and decomposes the same field operator as:
His vacuum, , is defined by for all .
Since both and are complete bases for the space of solutions, any mode in one basis can be expressed as a linear combination of the modes in the other. This is the heart of the Bogoliubov transformation.
The following text from Marcos Mariño's notes on 'QFT in curved space' provides a concise and rigorous derivation of the Bogoliubov transformations for both the field modes and the operators. It clearly defines the Bogoliubov coefficients and shows how the different sets of creation/annihilation operators are related.
Please read the text starting from 'One important point is that there is no natural way to perform this mode decomposition...' through to equation (3.76). Pay close attention to: How a mode from Bob's basis, ar{u}_j, is expanded in terms of Alice's basis, \{u_i, u_i^*\} (Eq. 3.68). How the coefficients \alpha_{ij} and eta_{ij} are calculated using the Klein-Gordon inner product (Eq. 3.69). The resulting transformations that relate Bob's operators \hat{b}_j, \hat{b}_j^\dagger to Alice's operators \hat{a}_i, \hat{a}_i^\dagger (Eq. 3.76).
Let's summarize the key relationships you've just studied. A mode from Bob's basis can be written in terms of Alice's basis functions as:
The coefficients are given by the Klein-Gordon inner product, which we introduced previously:
The coefficients measure the overlap between the two sets of positive-frequency modes, while the crucial coefficients measure the overlap between one observer's positive-frequency modes and the other's negative-frequency modes.
This leads directly to the transformation between the operators. Equating the two expansions for and solving for the operators gives (as shown in Eq. 3.76 of the notes):
This is the Bogoliubov transformation for the creation and annihilation operators. It explicitly shows that Bob's annihilation operator is a mixture of Alice's annihilation operator and, critically, her creation operator .
2. Preserving the Structure of Quantum Mechanics
The operators for both Alice and Bob must describe the same physics. Therefore, Bob's operators and must satisfy the same canonical commutation relations as Alice's operators:
Substituting the transformation laws into these relations imposes strong constraints on the Bogoliubov coefficients and . For instance, demanding that leads to the condition:
This is a normalization condition. In a more compact matrix notation, where and are treated as matrices, this becomes:
This relation is a fundamental property of Bogoliubov transformations, ensuring that the quantum structure of the theory (the commutation relations) is preserved when changing basis. You can find these relations as equations (3.77) and (3.82) in the resource you just read.
3. A Toy Model: The Parametrically Excited Oscillator
The full field theory can seem abstract. To build intuition, we can study a much simpler system that captures the essential physics: a single quantum harmonic oscillator whose frequency changes with time. This is a powerful analogy for a quantum field mode propagating through an expanding universe, where the expansion of space (the scale factor ) effectively changes the mode's frequency.
Imagine an oscillator that starts in the distant past () with a constant frequency and ends in the distant future () with a constant frequency .
- In the "in" region, we can define a vacuum state based on the ground state of the oscillator with frequency .
- In the "out" region, we define an "out" vacuum based on the ground state for frequency .
If we start the system in , what state will it be in at late times, as described by an observer in the "out" region? This is precisely the question the Bogoliubov transformation answers.
Introduction to Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime and the...
The following text from Ted Jacobson's lecture notes uses this harmonic oscillator analogy to provide a clear and simple derivation of the Bogoliubov transformation and its consequences.
Please read section 5.1, 'Parametric excitation of a harmonic oscillator' (pages 19-20). Focus on: How the 'in' and 'out' positive-frequency solutions, f_{in} and f_{out}, are defined. The Bogoliubov transformation relating them: f_{out} = \alpha f_{in} + eta ar{f}_{in} (Eq. 5.3). The resulting transformation between the 'in' and 'out' operators (Eq. 5.7). The key result for the number of 'out' particles found in the 'in' vacuum (Eq. 5.8).
As the notes show, the number of "out" quanta an observer would measure if the system was initially in the "in" vacuum is:
This confirms our general result in a simple, concrete model. If the frequency changes with time (), then , and the initial vacuum state becomes populated with particles. This phenomenon is called parametric excitation.
4. The Structure of the Vacuum: Squeezed States
We can go further than just calculating the average number of particles. What is the full quantum state of when expressed in the basis of "out" energy eigenstates? The Bogoliubov transformation allows us to find the exact answer. The result is that the "in" vacuum is what is known in quantum optics as a squeezed vacuum state from the "out" observer's perspective.
Introduction to Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime and the...
This final reading from Jacobson's notes derives the explicit form of the 'in' vacuum state in the 'out' basis and introduces the powerful concept of the squeeze operator.
Please read section 5.1.3, 'Relation between in and out ground states & the squeeze operator' (pages 22-23). The derivation leads to the beautiful result that the 'in' and 'out' ground states are related by the action of a unitary 'squeeze operator' S, such that (|0_{in} angle = S^\dagger |0_{out} angle).
The derivation shows that the "in" vacuum is a superposition of "out" states containing only pairs of particles:
This is the characteristic form of a squeezed state. For a quantum field, this means particles are always created in pairs with opposite momenta () to conserve momentum, as shown in resource LINK, Eq. (5.42). The fact that the relationship between the two vacua can be described by a unitary operator, the squeeze operator , underscores that this is a fully consistent quantum mechanical transformation.
Test your understanding!
Consider the Bogoliubov transformation for operators: . If an observer using the 'a' basis prepares a state with exactly one particle, , what is the average number of 'b' particles that an observer using the 'b' basis would measure in this state?
Show answer
We need to calculate .
First, let's write out :
Now, we evaluate the expectation value in the state : .
The terms and will give zero when acting on this state. For instance, because acting on produces a state proportional to , which is not a valid state but in any case is annihilated by . More simply, its matrix element between and itself is zero.
We are left with:
We know . For the second term, we use .
So the expectation value is:
Using the constraint , or , we get:
This shows that the one-particle state for Alice contains, on average, more than one particle for Bob, further illustrating the observer-dependent nature of particle content.
Conclusion
In this lesson, we have formalized the connection between different observers' descriptions of a quantum field. This is a cornerstone of QFT in curved spacetime.
Key Takeaways:
- Different choices of basis modes and lead to different sets of creation/annihilation operators.
- The relationship between these operators is a Bogoliubov transformation, parameterized by coefficients and .
- The coefficient quantifies the mixing of positive and negative frequencies between the two bases. A non-zero is the signal of particle ambiguity and creation.
- These transformations must satisfy constraints, such as , to preserve the canonical commutation relations.
- One observer's vacuum state appears as a squeezed state to another, containing particles created in pairs.
Preview of the Next Lesson:
We have now developed the essential mathematical machinery. In the next lesson, we will apply it to our first major physical prediction: the Unruh effect. We will perform a concrete calculation of the Bogoliubov coefficients that relate an inertial observer in Minkowski space to a uniformly accelerating one. This will allow us to derive the remarkable result that the accelerating observer perceives the empty Minkowski vacuum as a thermal bath of particles at a specific temperature proportional to their acceleration.