Hello! Welcome to the eighth module of our course. We are now entering the fascinating realm where general relativity and quantum mechanics meet: Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime.
In our last lesson, you masterfully derived the Unruh effect. The crucial takeaway was that an observer's notion of "particles" is not absolute. An observer accelerating uniformly through the empty Minkowski vacuum perceives a thermal bath of particles at a temperature , directly proportional to their acceleration. This profound result arises from the mismatch between the vacuum state defined by an inertial observer and that defined by the accelerating one, a mismatch captured by Bogoliubov transformations. The key ingredient was the presence of a causal horizon—the Rindler horizon.
Today, we will take this powerful idea and apply it to the ultimate gravitational object: a black hole. Our learning objective is to formulate quantum field theory near a black hole's event horizon. We will use the Equivalence Principle as our physical guide: the experience of an observer hovering just outside a black hole's horizon should be locally identical to that of an accelerating observer in flat space. By the end of this lesson, you will have constructed the complete mathematical framework needed to describe quantum fields in this environment, setting the stage for our derivation of Hawking radiation in the next session.
1. The Arena: Near-Horizon Geometry of a Black Hole
To study quantum effects near an event horizon, we must first understand the geometry of that region. We'll work with the simplest case: the static, uncharged Schwarzschild black hole. You'll recall the metric is:
The event horizon is located at the Schwarzschild radius, . Notice that the coefficient of goes to zero and the coefficient of diverges as . This coordinate singularity makes calculations difficult.
To remedy this, we introduce the tortoise coordinate, . This new radial coordinate is designed to "stretch" the horizon out to infinity, making the spacetime geometry near it more manageable.
Quantum Field Theory on Curved Spacetime and Black ...
The following notes provide a clear derivation of the tortoise coordinate and show how it simplifies the metric and the Klein-Gordon equation near the horizon.
Please read the section titled '3.3 Hawking Effect'. Focus on the portion from the beginning up to and including equation (3.46). Pay close attention to the definition of the tortoise coordinate r_* in equation (3.41) and how it transforms the metric into the form of equation (3.42).
As the reading explains, the tortoise coordinate is defined by , which integrates to:
In terms of , the radial-temporal part of the Schwarzschild metric becomes:
This form is very revealing. It is conformally flat—it looks just like the flat 2D Minkowski metric multiplied by a position-dependent conformal factor.
Now, consider the region very close to the horizon, where . Here, we can approximate the conformal factor:
From the definition of , we have , so . Defining a coordinate and a rescaled time, you can show that the near-horizon metric takes the form:
This is precisely the Rindler metric we studied in the last lesson! The surface gravity plays the role of the acceleration . This confirms our intuition from the Equivalence Principle: the geometry for a stationary observer near the horizon is locally Rindler spacetime.
2. Quantization in a Curved Background
Having established the geometry, we now need to set up the rules for quantum field theory.
Quantum Field Theory on Curved Spacetime and Black ...
Let's review the general procedure for quantizing a scalar field in a curved spacetime. This reading outlines the necessary modifications to the flat-space formalism.
Please read Section 2.3, from the beginning up to the subsection 'Bogoliubov Transformations and Particle Creation'. This covers the action for a scalar field in curved spacetime, the curved-space Klein-Gordon equation, and the general quantization procedure.
The key steps to formulate QFT on a curved background are:
- Start with the covariant action for a scalar field :
- Derive the equation of motion, which is the Klein-Gordon equation in curved spacetime:
- Expand the field operator in a basis of mode solutions to this equation:
The central challenge, as discussed in the reading, is the vacuum ambiguity. In a general curved spacetime, there is no global timelike Killing vector, and thus no unique way to separate modes into positive and negative frequencies. This means there is no unique, universally agreed-upon vacuum state.
3. Defining "In" and "Out" States for a Black Hole
For a Schwarzschild black hole that forms from collapse, the spacetime is asymptotically flat in the distant past and the distant future. This allows us to define two distinct, physically meaningful vacuum states.
To visualize this, we use a Kruskal-Szekeres diagram, which represents the maximal analytic extension of the Schwarzschild spacetime.

We can now define our quantum states:
-
The "In" State: A hypothetical observer at past null infinity, , before the black hole has a strong influence, would see a standard vacuum. We can define a set of positive-frequency modes with respect to the standard time coordinate there. The vacuum state defined by these modes, where for all , is called the Hartle-Hawking vacuum. It represents a state with no incoming particles from the distant past.
-
The "Out" State: A different observer at future null infinity, , measures outgoing particles. They will define their own set of positive-frequency modes, , corresponding to particles that escape the black hole. However, not all modes from the past reach . Some fall into the black hole. Therefore, a complete basis for modes in the future requires two sets:
- Modes that propagate to .
- Modes that propagate into the future horizon and hit the singularity.
The formalism is laid out nicely in the following resource.
These notes formalize the decomposition of the quantum field in terms of ingoing and outgoing modes, and explicitly sets up the Bogoliubov transformation between them.
Please read the section '2 The Hawking radiation' (pages 3-5). Focus on understanding the field expansions in equations (2.2) and (2.4), and the Bogoliubov transformation linking them in equation (2.8). The key idea is the Hilbert space decomposition in (2.5).
To summarize the structure:
- The field operator can be expanded in the "in" basis defined on .
- The same operator can be expanded in the "out" basis defined on and the future horizon.
- Since is a complete basis, the outgoing modes can be written as a linear combination of the ingoing modes:
This is our familiar Bogoliubov transformation. The physical question of Hawking radiation boils down to this: if the universe starts in the "in" vacuum , what is the number of outgoing particles detected by an observer at ? The answer is given by the expectation value of the "out" number operator:
If the coefficients are non-zero, it means the observer at infinity will detect particles, even though none were sent in. The black hole's gravitational field has "created" them.
4. The Entangled Vacuum
What is the physical nature of this Hartle-Hawking vacuum state near the horizon? The simple picture of particle-antiparticle pairs being created, with one falling in and one escaping, is a useful heuristic. The deeper reality lies in the structure of quantum entanglement.
Inside Black Holes | Leonard Susskind
Leonard Susskind provides an excellent conceptual explanation of the quantum mechanical nature of the black hole horizon. He describes how the vacuum state must be entangled across the horizon.
Please watch the segment from 37:07 to 43:10. Focus on his description of the vacuum as an entangled state between the interior ('A') and the exterior ('B') of the black hole. This entanglement is a mandatory feature of the vacuum state for a freely falling observer to experience nothing unusual as they cross the horizon.
As Susskind explains, for an infalling observer to pass through the horizon smoothly (as predicted by the Equivalence Principle), the quantum state of the vacuum must be highly entangled between modes just inside and just outside the horizon. This is the true nature of the Hartle-Hawking vacuum. The "particles" of Hawking radiation are, in a sense, a consequence of the observer at infinity only having access to one part of this entangled system (the "out" modes), while the other part (the "in-falling" modes) is traced over.
Test your understanding!
Why can't we just define a single, global vacuum state for the entire Schwarzschild spacetime in the same way we do for Minkowski space?
Show answer
The primary reason is the lack of a global timelike Killing vector field. In Minkowski space, the vector is timelike everywhere and represents time-translation symmetry. This allows a universal, observer-independent definition of positive and negative frequencies, and thus a unique vacuum state. In Schwarzschild spacetime, the Killing vector is timelike only in the exterior region (Region I). It becomes spacelike inside the horizon (Region II), meaning it no longer represents time evolution there. Without a global notion of "time," there is no unique way to define "frequency," leading to an ambiguity in the definition of particles and the vacuum.
5. A More Rigorous Formulation (Optional)
Given your interest in the mathematical foundations, it's worth noting that this entire structure can be put on a completely rigorous axiomatic footing, generalizing the Wightman axioms of QFT to curved spacetime.
For a glimpse into the formal mathematical structure, you can look at the following resource. This is advanced material that demonstrates how the thermal nature of the horizon can be proven from first principles of axiomatic QFT.
Skim Section 5.3, 'Quantum fields on Manifolds' (pages 14-17). You don't need to follow every detail, but try to appreciate the logical structure. It defines a quantum field on a manifold with a horizon-like structure and shows that if the state satisfies basic axioms (like being a ground state for one set of observers), it must satisfy the KMS condition—the defining property of a thermal state—for another set of observers tied to the horizon's geometry.
This axiomatic approach provides a powerful confirmation of our physical picture: the geometry of a causal horizon, when combined with the principles of quantum field theory, inevitably leads to thermal phenomena.
Conclusion
In this lesson, we have constructed the complete theoretical framework for describing quantum fields near a black hole's event horizon. You have accomplished the essential steps needed to tackle the derivation of Hawking radiation.
Key Takeaways:
- By using tortoise coordinates, the near-horizon geometry of a Schwarzschild black hole can be shown to be locally equivalent to Rindler spacetime, providing a concrete link to the Unruh effect.
- Quantizing a field in this background requires defining separate sets of modes for ingoing particles (at ) and outgoing particles (at and the horizon).
- The vacuum state for an infalling observer, the Hartle-Hawking vacuum (), is not seen as empty by a distant observer. The relationship between the "in" and "out" bases is described by a Bogoliubov transformation.
- The particle content of the outgoing radiation is determined by the Bogoliubov coefficient , which measures the mixing of positive and negative frequency modes.
- Conceptually, the Hartle-Hawking vacuum is a state that is highly entangled across the event horizon.
Preview of the Next Lesson:
We have set the stage perfectly. All the conceptual and formal machinery is in place. In our next lesson, we will get our hands dirty and perform the calculation. We will explicitly compute the Bogoliubov coefficients by tracing the "in" modes from past the collapsing star, near the horizon, and out to . This will allow us to derive the Hawking temperature of a Schwarzschild black hole.