Skip to main content

Someone wanted to learn this too, so Grasp built them a personal learning path.

You can keep exploring this one or create your own

Forming Negative Identity Statements

Recommended resources

The freely available resources this lesson will direct you to.

¡Allinllachu! Welcome back.

In our last lesson, we explored how to make affirmative statements using the evidential suffixes -mi and -si to show whether our knowledge is from direct experience or from hearsay. You learned to say things like Kayqa wasim (This is a house) and Payqa yachachiqsi (They say he/she is a teacher).

Today, we'll learn the other side of the coin: how to say something is not true. Our goal is to form negative statements about identity and characteristics using the 'mana...-chu' structure. This is a fundamental skill that will allow you to disagree, correct information, and express negation in conversations.

1. The Core of Quechua Negation: mana...-chu

In English, we use words like "not" or "isn't" to make a sentence negative. Quechua uses a special two-part structure. Think of it as a "negation sandwich."

The two pieces of bread are:

  1. The word mana (no, not)
  2. The suffix -chu

The "filling" of the sandwich is the word you want to negate. The structure looks like this:

mana + [word to be negated] + -chu

Let's see it in action. In the last lesson, you learned to say:

  • Kayqa wasi**m**. (This is a house.)

To negate this, you first remove the evidential suffix (-m). Then, you wrap the word wasi (house) in the mana...-chu sandwich:

  • Kayqa **mana** wasi**chu**. (This is not a house.)

Notice how mana comes before wasi, and -chu attaches directly to it. The mana...-chu structure replaces the evidential suffix (-mi or -si) you would use in an affirmative sentence.

Let's read a resource that introduces this concept clearly.

Imanalla - An Introduction to Kechwa

The textbook 'Imanalla - An Introduction to Kechwa' provides a concise explanation of how the suffix -chu is used to form negative answers. This will help you see the structure in context.

Please read the section titled 'The suffixes –chu and -mi'. Pay close attention to the examples of negative answers, like 'Mana, yachakujchu kan.' (No, he is not a student.) and how 'mana' is paired with the '-chu' suffix.

2. Constructing Negative Sentences

As you saw in the reading, the pattern is consistent. Let's break down how to turn an affirmative statement into a negative one.

Example 1: Negating Identity

  1. Start with an affirmative statement:
    Payqa yachachiq**mi**. (He/She is a teacher.)

  2. Identify the word to negate: The identity is yachachiq (teacher).

  3. Remove the evidential suffix (-mi):
    Payqa yachachiq.

  4. Apply the mana...-chu structure:
    Payqa **mana** yachachiq**chu**. (He/She is not a teacher.)

Example 2: Negating a Characteristic

  1. Affirmative: Allquqa hatun**mi**. (The dog is big.)
  2. Negate hatun (big): Allquqa **mana** hatun**chu**. (The dog is not big.)

Example 3: Negating Origin

  1. Affirmative: Qamqa Cusco-manta**m** kanki. (You are from Cusco.)
  2. Negate Cusco-manta (from Cusco): Qamqa **mana** Cusco-manta**chu** kanki. (You are not from Cusco.)

In all these cases, the mana...-chu pair signals negation and focuses it on a specific word.

A Note on manan

You may sometimes hear or read manan instead of mana. Manan is a contraction of mana and the evidential -mi. It adds a bit of emphasis, like saying "It is certainly not the case that...". For now, using mana is perfectly correct and clear.

  • Payqa **manan** yachachiqchu. (He/She is definitely not a teacher.)

3. Practice

Let's put this into practice.

Activity 1: Convert to Negative

Transform the following affirmative sentences into negative ones.

  1. Kayqa liwrum. (This is a book.)
  2. Noqaqa Maria**m** kani. (I am Maria.)
  3. Chayqa sumaq**mi**. (That is beautiful.)
Answers
  1. Kayqa **mana** liwru**chu**. (This is not a book.)
  2. Noqaqa **mana** Maria**chu** kani. (I am not Maria.)
  3. Chayqa **mana** sumaq**chu**. (That is not beautiful.)

Activity 2: Translate to Quechua

Now, let's try translating from English to Quechua. The following exercise will help you practice forming complete negative statements.

Imanalla - An Introduction to Kechwa

The 'Imanalla' textbook includes an exercise with English sentences to translate. This is a great way to test your understanding of the mana...-chu structure.

On page 10 of the PDF, find 'Rurana 1.15'. Focus on translating the negative part of sentences #2 and #3: 'No, he is not from Bolivia.' 'No, she is not an athlete.' (The vocabulary list on page 11 notes that 'athlete' is 'pugllaj'.)

Let's review the translations.

  • For "No, he is not from Bolivia," your sentence should be:
    Mana, payqa mana Bolivia-mantachu.
    Or, including the verb kay (to be):
    Mana, payqa mana Bolivia-mantachu kan.

  • For "No, she is not an athlete," your sentence should be:
    Mana, payqa mana pugllajchu.
    Or:
    Mana, payqa mana pugllajchu kan.

Excellent work. You are now able to both affirm and deny facts about identity and characteristics.

Conclusion

In this lesson, you've mastered a crucial component of Quechua grammar.

Key Takeaways:

  • Negative statements in Quechua are formed with the mana...-chu structure.
  • mana precedes the word being negated, and the suffix -chu attaches to the end of it.
  • The mana...-chu construction replaces the affirmative evidential suffixes (-mi, -si).
  • This structure can be used to negate identity (mana yachachiqchu), characteristics (mana hatunchu), and other information.

Preview of the Next Lesson:

Now that you can make both affirmative and negative statements about identity, we will focus on applying this to yourself. In our next lesson, you will learn how to state your occupation or role using the pattern 'occupation + -mi kani'. This will be a practical way to use what you've learned to introduce yourself more fully.

Tupananchiskama! (Until we meet again!)

Can't find a good explanation? Sign up and we'll make it for you

Sign up