Welcome back to our module on Corporate Income Tax (IS).
In the previous lesson, we established the critical process of reconciling accounting profit to taxable profit and mastered the first type of adjustment: permanent differences. We learned that these are definitive discrepancies, like fines, that are reintegrated once and never reverse.
Today, we will build directly on that foundation to tackle the second, more dynamic type of adjustment. This lesson focuses on temporary differences, which are timing-related gaps between accounting and tax rules. Understanding these is essential for accurate tax reporting, as they represent a significant portion of the adjustments you will make in practice.
Our learning outcome is to identify and apply adjustments for common temporary differences, with a specific focus on provisions for risks and charges.
1. What is a Temporary Difference?
A temporary difference (écart temporaire) arises when an expense or revenue is recognized in a different period for accounting purposes than for tax purposes. The key characteristic of a temporary difference is that it originates in one period and reverses in a subsequent period.
Think of it as a timing issue:
- Permanent Difference (Last Lesson): The tax rule and accounting rule will never agree. The adjustment is final.
- Temporary Difference (This Lesson): The tax rule and accounting rule will eventually agree on the total amount, but not on the timing. The adjustment made today will be cancelled out by an opposite adjustment in the future.
The most common mechanism you will encounter is:
- An expense is recorded in the accounting books this year.
- Tax law does not allow the deduction yet, because the expense is not considered final or certain.
- You must reintegrate the expense this year.
- In a future year, when the expense becomes certain and is actually paid, the tax law allows the deduction. At that point, you will make a corresponding deduction in your tax calculation.
This "reintegrate now, deduct later" cycle ensures that expenses are only deducted for tax purposes when they meet the strict criteria set by the tax code. The most prominent example of this is provisions.
2. Provisions for Risks and Charges (Provisions pour Risques et Charges)
Let's first recall what a provision is from an accounting standpoint. As we saw in Module 3, under the prudence principle, when a company faces a probable future loss or expense with an uncertain timing or amount, it must record a provision. This is done by recording an expense called an allocation to provisions (dotation aux provisions).
This provision is then recorded on the liability side of the balance sheet, as you can see in this example of a Moroccan fiscal balance sheet.

The Tax Treatment of Provisions
While accounting principles encourage recognizing probable losses early, the Moroccan General Tax Code (Code Général des Impôts - CGI) is much stricter. For a provision to be tax-deductible in the year it is created, the underlying risk or charge must be:
- Clearly identified in its nature and amount.
- Highly probable, not just possible.
- Expected to result in a charge that is itself tax-deductible.
In practice, many provisions created for accounting purposes (like a general provision for litigation or for client disputes) do not meet these stringent tax criteria. They are considered too uncertain.
This conflict in rules gives rise to a classic temporary difference. Let's examine the lifecycle.
The Adjustment Cycle: Reintegration and Deduction
Step 1: Year N - Creation of the Provision
- Accounting: The company records a
Dotation aux provisionsas an expense. This reduces the accounting profit. - Tax: If the provision is not fiscally justified (which is often the case), it is considered a non-deductible charge for Year N.
- Adjustment: You must reintegrate the full amount of the
dotationinto the accounting profit to calculate the taxable profit.
Step 2: Year N+X - The Risk Materializes or Disappears
Two things can happen in a future year:
Scenario A: The risk materializes. The company actually incurs the expense (e.g., pays the damages in a lawsuit). This actual expense is now a certain, definite charge and is generally tax-deductible. The provision, having served its purpose, is cancelled.
Scenario B: The risk does not materialize. The lawsuit is won, or the dispute is settled without cost. The provision is no longer needed and must be cancelled.
In both scenarios, cancelling the provision is done via an accounting entry called a reversal of provision (reprise sur provision). This reprise is recorded as a revenue item, increasing the accounting profit.
- Tax: Since you already paid tax on the amount of the provision in Year N (by reintegrating it), you should not be taxed on the
repriserevenue again. This would be double taxation. - Adjustment: You must make a deduction for the amount of the
reprisefrom your accounting profit.
This "reintegration of the dotation" followed by the "deduction of the reprise" is the mechanism that corrects the timing difference.
Practical Example: Provision for Litigation
Let's walk through a case for a Moroccan SME, "BATIPRO SARL".
-
Year 2023: BATIPRO is sued by a former employee for wrongful termination. Their lawyer advises that a loss is probable and estimates the potential damages at 100,000 DH.
- Accounting (Dec 31, 2023): BATIPRO records a
Dotation aux provisions pour litigesof 100,000 DH. This expense reduces its accounting profit. - Tax Treatment (for 2023 tax return): The outcome of the lawsuit is still uncertain. The provision does not meet the tax criteria for deductibility.
- 2023 Adjustment: Reintegrate 100,000 DH. BATIPRO pays tax on this amount in 2023.
- Accounting (Dec 31, 2023): BATIPRO records a
-
Year 2024: The court case concludes. BATIPRO is ordered to pay damages of 90,000 DH. The provision is now no longer needed.
- Accounting (in 2024):
- Record the actual, certain expense:
Charges de personnel(or similar) for 90,000 DH. - Cancel the old provision:
Reprise sur provisionof 100,000 DH (recorded as a financial revenue).
- Record the actual, certain expense:
- Tax Treatment (for 2024 tax return):
- The actual expense of 90,000 DH is a fully deductible charge. No adjustment needed.
- The
Repriseof 100,000 DH is in the accounting profit as revenue. But this amount was already taxed in 2023. To prevent double taxation, an adjustment is needed.
- 2024 Adjustment: Deduct 100,000 DH.
- Accounting (in 2024):
Summary of the Cycle:
| Year | Accounting Entry & Impact on Profit | Tax Treatment | Adjustment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dotation (Expense): -100,000 DH |
Non-deductible | Reintegrate 100,000 |
| 2024 | Actual Loss (Expense): -90,000 DH | Deductible | No adjustment |
| 2024 | Reprise (Revenue): +100,000 DH |
Non-taxable | Deduct 100,000 |
Over the two years, the net impact on taxable profit is a deduction of 90,000 DH, which is the actual economic loss. The temporary difference only shifted when the tax impact was felt. The entire reconciliation process is visually represented in interfaces like this one.

Test your understanding!
A company, "TECHNO-SOLUTIONS SARL," has a client who owes 45,000 DH. At the end of 2023, due to the client's financial difficulties, TECHNO-SOLUTIONS records a provision for client default (provision pour créances douteuses) for the full amount. For tax purposes, this provision is not considered justified at this stage.
In mid-2024, the client officially declares bankruptcy, and the debt is confirmed as being definitively unrecoverable (créance devenue irrécouvrable).
What are the necessary tax adjustments for TECHNO-SOLUTIONS in 2023 and 2024?
Show answer
Here is the breakdown of the adjustments:
-
For the 2023 Fiscal Year:
- Accounting: The company records a
Dotation aux provisionsof 45,000 DH, which reduces its accounting profit. - Tax Adjustment: Since the provision is not yet considered fiscally justified (the loss is probable but not certain), the expense is not deductible for tax purposes. Therefore, the company must reintegrate 45,000 DH.
- Accounting: The company records a
-
For the 2024 Fiscal Year:
- Accounting: When the debt becomes definitively unrecoverable, the company will do two things:
- Record the final loss:
Perte sur créances irrécouvrables(Loss on unrecoverable debts) of 45,000 DH. This is an expense. - Cancel the now-unnecessary provision:
Reprise sur provisionof 45,000 DH. This is a revenue.
- Record the final loss:
- Tax Adjustments:
- The actual loss of 45,000 DH is now a certain and definite charge, so it is tax-deductible. No adjustment is needed for this item; it correctly reduces the taxable profit.
- The reversal of the provision (
Reprise) of 45,000 DH is recorded as revenue. Since this amount was already taxed in 2023 (via the reintegration), it must be removed from the 2024 taxable profit to avoid double taxation. Therefore, the company must make a deduction of 45,000 DH.
- Accounting: When the debt becomes definitively unrecoverable, the company will do two things:
The temporary difference has fully reversed. The initial reintegration in 2023 is perfectly cancelled out by the deduction in 2024.
Conclusion
You have now learned to manage temporary differences, a concept that can be challenging but is logical once you understand the "reintegrate now, deduct later" cycle. By mastering this, you are adding a crucial skill for accurate corporate tax calculation.
Key Takeaways:
- A temporary difference is a timing mismatch between accounting and tax rules that originates in one period and reverses in a future one.
- Provisions for risks and charges are a prime example.
- The
Dotation(allocation) to a provision is often reintegrated in the year it's created because it doesn't meet the strict tax criteria for certainty. - The
Reprise(reversal) of that same provision in a future year is deducted, ensuring the amount is not taxed twice. - This cycle ensures that from a tax perspective, an expense is only recognized when it becomes certain and quantifiable.
Preview of the Next Lesson:
Provisions are just one source of temporary differences. Another major source arises from the depreciation of fixed assets. The accounting depreciation (based on an asset's useful economic life) can differ from the tax depreciation (based on rates fixed by law). In our next lesson, we will focus entirely on this topic: calculating tax depreciation according to Moroccan fiscal rules and determining the resulting adjustment. This will complete your understanding of the most common adjustments in corporate income tax.