Welcome to your fourth lesson. In our previous sessions, we explored how a hegemonic discourse is constructed—first by establishing a nodal point like 'Cyber Sovereignty' and then by defining it against a 'constitutive outside'. Today, we shift our focus from the construction of discourse to its reception. We will investigate why a counter-hegemonic narrative, such as China's Digital Silk Road discourse, might appeal to political actors in Africa.
To do this, we will delve into two powerful concepts from the Romanian political theorist Sergiu Mișcoiu: dislocation and the split subject. These ideas will help you build a crucial part of your theoretical framework, explaining the conditions that make an audience receptive to a new political message. We will examine how crises in the dominant global order create openings for new ideologies, and how the inherent incompleteness of political identity creates a demand for narratives that promise wholeness and recognition.
1. Dislocation: When the Old Story Fails
The first concept, dislocation (dislocare in Romanian), describes a moment or a process where a dominant discursive system begins to fail. It can no longer account for events, satisfy the demands of its subjects, or maintain its "common sense" status. This failure creates a structural crisis, a "window of opportunity" where signifiers are set free from their old meanings and become available for re-articulation into a new, competing discourse.
To get a clear, theoretical overview of this concept, please watch the following video. It explains dislocation as a fundamental aspect of discourse theory.
Dislocation - How can we explain and understand change in discourse?
This video, "Dislocation - How can we explain and understand change in discourse?", provides a concise academic introduction to the concept.
Please watch the following segments: First, watch the introduction which defines dislocation as a state of lack and an inherent feature of any discursive system. Next, pay close attention to the explanation of dislocation at both the structural and individual levels. The connection made here to the 'split' or incomplete subject is a direct bridge to the second part of our lesson. Finally, focus on the segment that frames dislocation as creating windows of opportunity for "hegemonic interventions." This is the key mechanism that allows a new discourse to emerge.
The video explains that dislocation isn't just a catastrophic event (like the 9/11 example it gives), but a constant potential within any discourse. For your thesis, this means you don't necessarily need to find a single, dramatic crisis. Dislocation can manifest as a growing disillusionment with the promises of the Western digital model—its failure to bridge the digital divide, its association with surveillance by Western powers, or its inability to foster genuine economic sovereignty.
Now, let's see how Mișcoiu applies this concept in a concrete political analysis. In his paper on post-communist Romania, he demonstrates how the established "Iliescian" political discourse became dislocated, allowing a new opposition discourse to capture key signifiers.
[PDF] What Grounds for Representing the People? An Analysis of Post ...
In this reading, Sergiu Mișcoiu provides a case study of dislocation in action, showing how the decay of one system creates the raw material for another.
Please read the section that begins "The fourth assertion of discourse theory..." in Mișcoiu's paper. You can find this by searching for the phrase displacement of a discursive order. Focus on how Mișcoiu describes the "Iliescian" system reaching "saturation." Notice how this allowed for the "release of signifiers" like Justice, Truth, and Freedom, which were then captured by the opposition alliance to build a new, winning counter-discourse.
This is the central mechanism of dislocation: the dominant narrative breaks down, and its core concepts are pulled into a new constellation of meaning by an aspiring hegemonic force. In your research, you might analyze how signifiers like 'sovereignty', 'development', and 'security' are being "released" from the Western liberal framework and "captured" by China's discourse on 'Cyber Sovereignty'.
2. The Split Subject: The Quest for a Coherent Identity
If dislocation explains the structural opportunity for a new discourse, the concept of the split subject (subiectul scindat in Romanian) explains the psychological or existential motivation for actors to embrace it.
The idea, which has roots in the psychoanalytic work of Jacques Lacan, posits that a complete, whole, and fully integrated identity is impossible. The subject is "split" between their conscious sense of self (the ego) and the vast, unknown territory of the unconscious. Language and society give us labels and identities, but there is always a remainder, a sense of lack or incompleteness.
To briefly ground this idea, the following video offers a short explanation of the Lacanian concept of the 'barred' or split subject.
The Lacanian Subject (Descartes and Lacan)
This video, "The Lacanian Subject," explains the psychoanalytic origins of the split subject concept, which underpins its use in political theory.
You don't need to absorb all the psychoanalytic details, but focus on two key moments: The segment defining the split between the signifier and the signified. This highlights the core idea: our representation of ourselves is never the same as our actual being. The explanation of the split between the ego and the unconscious, where the ego is described as a "false being" that attempts to master the thoughts and desires emerging from the unconscious.
Political theorists like Mișcoiu, drawing on Žižek, adapt this concept to the political sphere. They argue that this fundamental "lack" in our identity drives us to seek wholeness in political projects. We identify with ideologies, leaders, or national identities that promise to resolve our internal contradictions and make us complete. When a political subject—be it an individual, a social group, or a state—feels its identity is threatened, incomplete, or delegitimized, it becomes intensely receptive to a new discourse that promises to restore it.
Let's return to Mișcoiu's text to see how he connects this to politics.
[PDF] What Grounds for Representing the People? An Analysis of Post ...
Here, Mișcoiu directly links the psychoanalytic concept of the split subject to the political behavior of actors in post-communist Romania, showing how the search for identity drives political choices.
Please read the section that starts with "Finally, discourse theory postulates that the displacement...". Find the passage on the emergence of the “split subject”. As you read, focus on this critical sentence: "the failure of the ‘final identification’ induces a dramatisation of the quest for identity which can be manifested by opting for radical discourses that promise immediate identity fulfilment." Also, note the crucial role of blame: "it is always ‘others’ who are responsible for ‘our’ failure to acquire full identity."
Mobilizing These Concepts for Your Thesis
So, how do you use these ideas to analyze the reception of China's Digital Silk Road discourse in Africa?
-
Identify the Dislocation: Your task is to identify the "dislocation" that makes a Chinese counter-hegemonic discourse appealing. Has the dominant Western/neoliberal discourse on technology, development, and governance failed to address the specific demands of certain African states? For example, has the promise of "internet freedom" been perceived as a threat to regime stability, or has "free market" tech development led to dependence on foreign corporations rather than local capacity-building? This gap between the promises of the old discourse and the experienced reality is the dislocation.
-
Identify the Split Subject and Its Desire: Who is the "split subject" in your analysis? It could be a specific African regime that feels marginalized by the Western-dominated international system. Its "split" is the gap between its desired identity (as a sovereign, modern, respected nation) and its current perceived status (as a 'developing' nation, a 'rule-taker', dependent on aid).
-
Connect Discourse to Desire: Show how China's discourse speaks directly to this split subject's desire for wholeness.
- China's narrative offers an identity as a partner in a "Community of a Shared Future," not a recipient of aid.
- The discourse of "Cyber Sovereignty" promises to restore the "missing piece" of identity: control, authority, and sovereignty in the digital realm.
- It provides a clear "other" to blame for the current lack—Western "digital colonialism"—thus fulfilling the Žižekian point Mișcoiu raises about responsibility displacement.
By combining dislocation and the split subject, you can construct a powerful argument that the appeal of China's discourse is not simply about economic benefits. It is also about offering a powerful new identity to political actors who feel that the dominant global narrative has failed them.
Conclusion and Next Steps
In this lesson, we have explored two key concepts for understanding the reception of discourse.
- Dislocation (dislocare) refers to the breakdown of a dominant discursive system, which creates a structural opening for a new hegemonic project to emerge by capturing floating signifiers.
- The Split Subject (subiectul scindat) describes the inherent incompleteness of identity that creates a psychological and political demand for narratives that promise recognition, wholeness, and fulfillment.
Together, these concepts provide a sophisticated theoretical lens to explain why and under what conditions a counter-hegemonic discourse like China's might find a receptive audience in Africa.
In our next and final lesson, we will move from the universal dynamics of discourse to the concrete realities of power. We will examine the concept of weaponized interdependence, analyzing how the material infrastructure of the Digital Silk Road—the fiber optic cables, data centers, and 5G networks—doesn't just support the discourse of 'Cyber Sovereignty' but actively enforces it, creating tangible panopticon and chokepoint effects that reshape the geopolitical landscape.