Introduction
Welcome to the final lesson of this module on Merleau-Ponty's late ontology. Over the past few lessons, we have navigated the dense and innovative concepts of his final, unfinished work, The Visible and the Invisible. We have defined the ontological concepts of 'Flesh' (la chair), 'reversibility', the 'chiasm', and 'wild Being'. In our last session, we drew a clear line between the 'lived body' of his earlier phenomenology and the ontological 'Flesh' of his late philosophy, charting his intellectual journey from a study of experience to a study of Being itself.
Today, we will put this new conceptual framework into practice. The learning outcome for this lesson is to draft a short critical analysis (300-500 words) of a passage from The Visible and the Invisible. This is a capstone exercise for the module, designed to transition you from understanding these concepts to using them analytically—a crucial step toward your goal of writing philosophical essays. We will break down what a critical analysis entails and provide a structure to guide your writing.
1. What is a Critical Analysis in Philosophy?
Before tackling the text, let's clarify the task. A "critical analysis" is not a simple summary. It involves unpacking an author's argument, identifying its core components, and explaining their significance within the author's broader philosophical project. Rather than just restating what the text says, you are actively demonstrating how it works and why it matters.
Since you have a background in mathematics, you can think of this process as being analogous to explaining a key step in a proof. You must first state the proposition (the main idea in the passage), then use the relevant definitions (the key concepts like Flesh, reversibility, etc.) to show how the author's reasoning functions, and finally, explain the importance of this step for the overall theorem (Merleau-Ponty's ontology).
To help clarify this distinction between passive summary and active analysis, let's watch a short video.
How to Write a Critical Analysis Essay (Professor Explains)
The following video, 'How to Write a Critical Analysis Essay' from the channel Professor Mark Egan, provides a clear general framework for what markers look for in an analytical piece. It helps distinguish passive 'description' from active 'critical analysis'.
Please watch the segment from 01:13 to 03:35. Pay attention to the distinction between being 'passive' (describing, listing ideas) and being 'active' (using sources, showing connections, building an argument). The goal is to see how you can 'do' something with the text, not just report on it.
The key takeaway here is to be an "active" reader and writer. Your task is to show the relationships between the ideas in the passage and the larger ontological concepts we have been studying. You will use the concepts of Flesh and reversibility to illuminate the passage, and use the passage to provide concrete evidence for your understanding of these concepts.
2. The Primary Text: A Passage on Reversibility
Now, let's turn to the primary text. The following passage is taken from the chapter "The Intertwining—The Chiasm" in Merleau-Ponty's The Visible and the Invisible. It contains one of his most famous illustrations of the reversibility that defines Flesh: the experience of one hand touching the other.
[PDF] The Intertwining-The Chiasm - DOUBLE OPERATIVE
We will focus on a short but pivotal passage from Merleau-Ponty's 'The Intertwining—The Chiasm'. This is the raw material for your analysis.
Please read the following passage carefully. It begins on page 133 with the words 'How does it happen...' and ends on page 134 with '...as it were in the things.' Try to identify the sequence of Merleau-Ponty's thought. How does he move from the simple act of touching to a profound ontological claim?
Here is the passage for your analysis:
How does it happen that I give to my hands, in particular, that degree, that rate, and that direction of movement that are capable of making me feel the textures of the sleek and the rough? Between the exploration and what it will teach me, between my movements and what I touch, there must exist some relationship by principle, some kinship, according to which they are not only, like the pseudopods of the amoeba, vague and ephemeral deformations of the corporeal space, but the initiation to and the opening upon a tactile world. This can happen only if my hand, while it is felt from within, is also accessible from without, itself tangible, for my other hand, for example, if it takes its place among the things it touches, is in a sense one of them, opens finally upon a tangible being of which it is also a part. Through this crisscrossing within it of the touching and the tangible, its own movements incorporate themselves into the universe they interrogate, are recorded on the same map as it; the two systems are applied upon one another, as the two halves of an orange. ... when my right hand touches my left hand while it is palpating the things... the "touching subject" passes over to the rank of the touched, descends into the things, such that the touch is formed in the midst of the world and as it were in the things.
— The Visible and the Invisible, pp. 133-134
Your task is to analyze this specific description and connect it to the core ideas of his late ontology.
3. A Framework for Your Analysis
To help you structure your thoughts, here is a suggested outline for your 300-500 word analysis.
1. Introduction (approx. 50 words)
- Start by identifying the central theme of the passage. What is Merleau-Ponty illustrating? (e.g., the reversibility of the touching and the tangible).
- State its significance: briefly mention that this example is key to understanding his ontological concept of 'Flesh'.
2. Exposition (approx. 150 words)
- Unpack the example itself. What happens when one hand touches the other?
- Explain the key distinction Merleau-Ponty makes: the hand is simultaneously a 'touching subject' and a 'touched object' (tangible).
- Define the key terms from the passage, such as the "crisscrossing" of the touching and the tangible.
3. Analysis (approx. 200 words)
- Connect the example to the broader concepts from this module.
- Reversibility: How does this "crisscrossing" demonstrate the fundamental reversibility of the sensible?
- Chiasm: Explain how this intertwining is a concrete instance of the chiasm.
- Flesh: How does this experience dissolve the traditional subject-object distinction and reveal the body and the world as being made of the same elemental 'Flesh'? Explain how the "touch is formed in the midst of the world," not 'in the mind'.
4. Conclusion (approx. 50 words)
- Summarize why this passage is so important. What does it show us about Merleau-Ponty's final philosophical project? (e.g., It grounds his ontology in a concrete, lived experience, moving philosophy away from abstract reflection).
As a helpful model for explaining these ideas, you might revisit the secondary source from earlier, which explicitly discusses the hand-touching example.
[PDF] Flesh: An Innovative Approach of Merleau-Ponty In Phenomenology
For a model of how to connect the hand-touching example to the concepts of Chiasm and reversibility, you can briefly review this secondary source.
Quickly re-read the section on page 577 that begins 'Merleau-Ponty uses ‘chiasm or shaisma’...' and explains the hand-touching example. Notice how the author connects the concrete description to the abstract terms. This is the kind of analytical move you should aim for.
4. Writing Assignment
Now it's your turn. Using the passage from Merleau-Ponty and the framework provided above, please draft your critical analysis.
Task: Write a 300-500 word critical analysis of the passage from The Visible and the Invisible (pp. 133-134) provided in Section 2 of this lesson. Focus on explaining how the example of the touching hands illustrates Merleau-Ponty's ontological concepts of reversibility, chiasm, and Flesh.
Take your time to compose your thoughts. The goal is clarity and analytical depth, not speed.
Conclusion
In this lesson, you have taken the final and most important step in this module: applying abstract philosophical concepts to a primary text. By analyzing Merleau-Ponty's description of the touching hands, you are engaging with his thought at the level of practice, not just theory.
Key Takeaways:
- A critical analysis moves beyond summary to explain how an author's argument works and why it is significant.
- Merleau-Ponty's example of one hand touching another is not just a curious observation; it is a concrete demonstration of reversibility.
- This reversibility reveals the chiasm (intertwining) of subject and object, sentient and sensible.
- Ultimately, the experience points to an underlying ontological element—the Flesh—of which both body and world are composed.
Preview of the Next Module:
This lesson has been a crucial bridge to our final module, Writing and Research in Phenomenology. Having now drafted your first short analysis, you are prepared to tackle the challenges of writing a full-length philosophical essay. In the next module, we will explore how to build a sustained argument, engage critically with secondary sources, formulate a strong thesis statement, and refine your writing for scholarly rigor.