Skip to main content

Welcome to a Grasp lesson

Create a free account to keep studying and create your own study path.

Lesson 38

Derivatives of Inverse Trigonometric and Parametric Functions

Recommended resources

Welcome back! In our last lesson, we mastered the chain rule for composite and implicit functions. You learned to see functions as nested structures and to differentiate them from the "outside-in," a skill that is the bedrock of advanced differentiation.

Today, we'll build directly on that foundation to tackle the learning outcome: to differentiate inverse trigonometric and parametric functions. These are two special but very common types of functions that frequently appear in the MHT-CET. Since you've identified trigonometry and inverse trigonometry as areas needing focus, this lesson is a great opportunity to strengthen your skills by combining them with your growing expertise in calculus. We'll start with the derivatives of inverse trigonometric functions and then move to parametric differentiation.

1. Differentiating Inverse Trigonometric Functions

You've already studied the properties of inverse trigonometric functions, but how do we find their rate of change? The answer lies in the implicit differentiation technique you learned in the previous lesson.

Let's take . This is equivalent to writing . If we differentiate this implicit relationship with respect to , we get:

Solving for gives us:

Using the identity , we can express as . Since , this becomes . Thus, we arrive at the famous result:

All six inverse trigonometric derivatives can be found this way. The following resource walks through each derivation.

Derivative of Inverse Trigonometric Functions

This article from Careers360 provides a step-by-step derivation for the derivatives of all six inverse trigonometric functions using the implicit differentiation method we just discussed.

Please read the section titled "Differentiation of Inverse Trigonometric Functions". As you go through the derivations for each function (\sin^{-1}x, \cos^{-1}x, etc.), focus on how each step relies on: Rewriting the inverse function in its standard trigonometric form (e.g., y = \tan^{-1}x \implies \tan y = x). Applying implicit differentiation. Using a Pythagorean identity to substitute back in terms of x.

After working through the derivations, the key is to commit the final formulas to memory. Here are the standard results, now combined with the chain rule for a general function :

Notice the patterns: the derivatives of cos, cot, and csc functions are just the negative of their sin, tan, and sec counterparts.

The following video from The Organic Chemistry Tutor demonstrates how to apply these formulas with the chain rule in practice.

Derivatives of Inverse Trigonometric Functions

This video provides clear, worked-out examples for differentiating the main inverse trigonometric functions.

Watch these four examples to see the formulas in action: Arc sine: This example shows how to find the derivative of \sin^{-1}(x^3), clearly identifying u and u'. Arc cosine: This segment works through \cos^{-1}(5x-9). Arc tangent: This part differentiates \tan^{-1}(\sqrt{x}), which requires careful handling of the radical. Arc secant: This final example covers \sec^{-1}(x^4) and discusses the absolute value in the formula.

Simplification Before Differentiation

A crucial strategy for MHT-CET is to simplify complex inverse trigonometric expressions before you differentiate. Applying the chain rule directly to a complicated function like would be a nightmare. Instead, we can use a trigonometric substitution to simplify the argument.

The key is to recognize patterns that match trigonometric identities.

This table shows the three most common algebraic expressions and the corresponding trigonometric substitutions that simplify them using Pythagorean identities.

For the example above, the expression suggests the substitution , which uses the identity . Let's see how this plays out in a solved example.

Derivative of Inverse Trigonometric Functions

The solved examples in this article demonstrate the power of simplification.

Focus on Example 1 and Example 5. In both cases, observe how a trigonometric substitution or identity is used to dramatically simplify the function inside the inverse trig function, making the final differentiation step trivial.


2. Differentiating Parametric Functions

Next, we consider functions defined in parametric form. Instead of having as a direct function of , both and are given as functions of a third variable, called a parameter (commonly or ). For example, the path of a projectile in physics can be described by its horizontal position and vertical position as functions of time.

Our goal is still to find , the rate of change of with respect to . We can do this using the chain rule:

Rearranging this to solve for gives us the core formula for parametric differentiation:

The following video provides an excellent, MHT-CET-focused explanation of this concept.

MHT-CET Differentiation Lec 02 | Implicit Functions and parametric functions | live 7:30 PM

This video from the EquationX channel introduces parametric differentiation using a helpful analogy and applies it to MHT-CET problems.

First, watch the instructor's introduction from this segment. He explains the concept of a parameter as a "mutual friend" that connects x and y, and derives the formula \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dy/d\theta}{dx/d\theta}. Next, skip to the example from this part, where the parameter is t. This is a straightforward application of the formula.

Differentiating One Function with Respect to Another

A very common MHT-CET question type asks you to "differentiate function with respect to function ". This is just a disguised parametric problem where itself is the parameter.

Let and . The problem is asking for . Using the parametric rule with as the parameter, we get:

The same video shows exactly how to tackle this.

MHT-CET Differentiation Lec 02 | Implicit Functions and parametric functions | live 7:30 PM

This part of the video explains and solves problems involving differentiating one function with respect to another.

First, watch the explanation from this segment, where the instructor sets up the problem of differentiating \sin^3(x) with respect to \cos^2(x). Then, watch the solution to a challenging PYQ that uses this same concept from this part. The problem is to find \frac{dy}{dx} at \theta = 3\pi/4 for x = a \cos^4\theta and y = a \sin^4\theta. Notice how he breaks it down step-by-step.


Conclusion

In this lesson, you've added two powerful techniques to your calculus toolkit, both of which are direct applications of the chain rule. You've seen how to differentiate inverse trigonometric functions and how to tackle parametric equations, including the common MHT-CET variant of differentiating one function with respect to another.

Key Takeaways:

  • Derivatives of Inverse Trig Functions: These are a set of standard formulas. In problems, they are almost always used with the chain rule: .
  • Simplify First: For complex inverse trigonometric expressions, always look for an opportunity to use trigonometric identities or substitutions to simplify the expression before differentiating.
  • Parametric Differentiation: For and , the derivative is found by taking the ratio of individual derivatives with respect to the parameter: .
  • Function vs. Function: Differentiating with respect to is a parametric problem where is the parameter. The derivative is .

In our next lesson, we will explore logarithmic differentiation. This is a special technique used for functions that are otherwise very difficult or impossible to differentiate with our current rules, particularly those of the form .