Introduction
In our last lesson, we developed the tools to price insurance products and calculate reserves within the framework of time-homogeneous Markov processes. We assumed that the transition rates, , were constant over time. This was a convenient simplification, but in the real world, particularly in actuarial science, this is rarely the case. For example, the probability of a person dying or becoming ill changes significantly with age.
This lesson marks our transition into the more realistic and powerful world of time-inhomogeneous Markov processes. We will define what it means for transition rates to depend on time (or age) and explore how this changes our modeling approach. Our main objective will be to set up the governing differential equations for these processes—the time-inhomogeneous version of Kolmogorov's equations. While we won't be solving these equations in full just yet, mastering their setup is the critical first step.
Defining Time-Inhomogeneous Transition Rates
In a time-homogeneous model, the rate of moving from state to state , , is a constant. In a time-inhomogeneous model, this rate becomes a function of time. In actuarial contexts, this "time" is typically the age of the individual.
We introduce a new notation to capture this dependency. The force of transition or transition intensity from state to state at age is denoted by . This represents the instantaneous rate of transition for an individual who was in a starting state at age and is now age .
Let's formalize this. We previously defined the transition probability . The transition intensity is defined as the instantaneous rate of change of this probability for a transition out of state .
[PDF] life contingency models ii - vladislav kargin - Binghamton University
This document from Binghamton University provides a rigorous mathematical foundation for multi-state models, which we will build upon.
Please read the section that formally defines the transition intensity. Start at the notation for transition probabilities and focus on Definition 2.11, which gives the precise mathematical meaning of \mu_{x}^{ij}. Note that the text uses \mu_{x}^{ij} to mean the intensity at age x; we will often use \mu_{x+t}^{ij} to emphasize the dependency on time t elapsed since entry age x.
As the definition shows, the transition intensity is the derivative of the transition probability over an infinitesimally small time interval, evaluated at . This leads to the crucial approximation for a small time interval :
This is the building block for the dynamics of the entire system.
The Inhomogeneous Kolmogorov Equations
In the time-homogeneous case, we had the Kolmogorov forward and backward equations, and , where was a constant matrix of rates. This led to the elegant solution .
When the transition rates are time-dependent, the generator matrix itself becomes a function of time. We'll denote it , where its entries are . Because the generator matrix is no longer constant, we cannot simply use the matrix exponential to find the transition probabilities. Instead, we must return to the differential equations themselves.
The video below re-introduces the Kolmogorov equations in their matrix form, which provides a good bridge from the homogeneous case we've already studied.
Lec 11 Continuous-Time Markov Chains, Generator Matrix, Kolmogorov Equations
This lecture from NPTEL IIT Guwahati derives the Kolmogorov equations and presents their general matrix form.
Please watch the segment from 31:31 to 34:23. The lecturer presents the system of differential equations for the transition probabilities p_{ij}(t). Pay close attention to the final matrix notation: Forward Equation: P'(t) = P(t) Q Backward Equation: P'(t) = Q P(t) For our inhomogeneous case, you should think of the generator matrix Q as being a function of time, Q(t), or more precisely in actuarial notation, \Gamma_{x+t}.
The core structure of the equations remains, but their solution becomes more complex. Let's look at the formal statement of these equations in the time-inhomogeneous context.
[PDF] life contingency models ii - vladislav kargin - Binghamton University
Now, let's look at the formal theorems for the inhomogeneous equations from the same document.
Please read the statements and surrounding text for Theorem 2.15 (Kolmogorov's forward equations) and Theorem 2.16 (Kolmogorov's backward equations). You can find them by looking for the text Theorem 2.15 and Theorem 2.16. Don't worry about the proofs for now, but focus on understanding the structure of the resulting matrix differential equations.
Let's summarize these crucial results. Let be the matrix of transition probabilities .
-
Kolmogorov's Forward Equation:
This equation is "forward" because the time derivative acts on the end of the time interval , while the rates are also evaluated at the end. It describes how the probabilities evolve by considering the last infinitesimal step of the process.
-
Kolmogorov's Backward Equation:
This equation is "backward" because the derivative acts on the start of the time interval , and the rates are also evaluated at the start. It describes the evolution by considering the first infinitesimal step.
To build some intuition for how these equations are formed, let's consider the backward equation for a single transition probability, . We condition on what happens in the first small instant of time. The process can either stay in state or move to some other state .
The following video provides a nice, non-technical walkthrough of this logic.
Kolmogorov Backward Differential
The presenter in this video, MJ the Fellow Actuary, explains how to build the backward equation for a single transition probability by summing over all possible first moves.
Watch from 00:44 to 03:53. The key idea is expressed in the abstract formula at the beginning and then clarified with two concrete examples: moving from "Healthy" to "Corona" and from "Healthy" to "Dead". This illustrates how the rate of change of a transition probability depends on the rates of all possible immediate next steps, weighted by the probabilities of subsequent paths.
An Important Special Case: The Survival Probability
While solving the full system of differential equations for is often complex and requires numerical methods (our next topic), there is a very important special case where we can find a direct analytical solution.
Consider the probability of remaining in a state for a full duration of years, which we denote . If state is a state that cannot be re-entered once left (like the "Healthy" state in a permanent disability model), then this is the same as the transition probability .

The differential equation for this probability is:
Since , this is a first-order separable ordinary differential equation. With the initial condition , the solution is:
This should look familiar. The term is the total force of exit from state . In survival analysis, this is precisely the hazard rate (or force of mortality). The formula above is the fundamental relationship between the survival function and the integrated hazard function.
Let's see this applied in a concrete example.
[PDF] life contingency models ii - vladislav kargin - Binghamton University
We will now examine an example where one of the transition intensities is a function of age, and we need to calculate a survival probability.
Please read part (b) of Example 2.17. Find the text for part (b). Follow the calculation for {}_{10}p_{30}^{00}. Notice how it directly applies the integral formula we just discussed, integrating the sum of the time-dependent forces of transition out of state 0.
This example perfectly illustrates the process:
- Identify the forces of exit from the state of interest (state 0). In this case, they are and .
- Sum them to get the total hazard: .
- Integrate this total hazard over the desired time interval (from 0 to 10 years).
- Exponentiate the negative of the result to get the survival probability.
For other probabilities, like , the resource correctly notes that one must write down the full Kolmogorov differential equation, which generally does not have a simple analytical solution.
Conclusion
In this lesson, we have made the crucial leap from time-homogeneous to time-inhomogeneous Markov models. This allows for a much more realistic representation of processes where risks, like mortality or sickness, evolve with age.
Key Takeaways:
- Time-inhomogeneous models use transition intensities, , which are functions of time or age.
- The governing dynamics are described by Kolmogorov's forward and backward differential equations, where the generator matrix, , is now time-dependent.
- The forward equation, , considers the evolution at the end of the time interval.
- The backward equation, , considers the evolution from the start of the interval.
- In the special case of calculating the probability of remaining in a state with no re-entry, we can use a direct integral formula: .
We have learned how to define the rates and set up the governing equations. In our next lesson, we will tackle the practical challenge of actually solving these equations using numerical methods to find the transition probabilities.