Hello! Welcome to our next lesson on rotational kinematics.
In our last session, we decomposed the acceleration of a particle in non-uniform circular motion into two orthogonal components: tangential acceleration (), responsible for changing speed, and centripetal acceleration (), responsible for changing direction. We derived their magnitudes as and .
Today, we will elevate these scalar relationships into their full, powerful 3D vector forms. This lesson directly addresses the learning outcome: Prove the relationships between linear and angular kinematic quantities (v = ωr, a_t = αr). We will achieve this by deriving the fundamental vector equations that connect the linear quantities (, ) with their angular counterparts (, ). This rigorous, vector-based approach provides a more general and profound understanding of motion, extending far beyond simple 2D circles.
1. Angular Quantities as Vectors
Before we can prove the relationships, we must first formally define angular velocity and acceleration as vector quantities.
-
Angular Velocity ():
- Magnitude: The magnitude is the angular speed, i.e., the rate of change of the angle, .
- Direction: The vector points along the axis of rotation. Its specific direction is determined by the right-hand thumb rule: if you curl the fingers of your right hand in the direction of rotation, your thumb points in the direction of .
-
Angular Acceleration ():
- Definition: The angular acceleration vector is the time derivative of the angular velocity vector: .
- Direction: If the rotation is speeding up (i.e., is increasing), points in the same direction as . If the rotation is slowing down, points in the opposite direction.
The following video provides an excellent visual introduction to these concepts and asserts the vector relationships we are about to prove.
Circular Motion Everything You Need To Know!
To begin, watch this segment from the 'Brain Station Advanced' channel. It clearly explains the vector nature of angular displacement, velocity, and acceleration, which is the foundation for our derivations.
Please watch from 03:13 to 09:58. Focus on how the right-hand rule is used to define the direction of the angular vectors and take note of the asserted cross-product relationships for linear velocity (\vec{v} = \vec{\omega} imes \vec{r}) and tangential acceleration (\vec{a}_t = \vec{\alpha} imes \vec{r}). We will now prove these rigorously.
2. The Calculus of a Rotating Frame
The core challenge in deriving the link between linear and angular velocity lies in the fact that for a rotating object, the natural coordinate system (polar or cylindrical) has unit vectors that themselves change direction over time. A Cartesian system with fixed and vectors does not have this complexity (), but it is less natural for describing rotation.

To derive the velocity, we must differentiate the position vector . In polar coordinates, the position of a particle is elegantly expressed as:
where is the radial distance from the origin and is the radial unit vector.
3. Proof: The Relationship between Linear and Angular Velocity
To find the velocity , we apply the product rule:
The term represents the velocity component due to a change in the radial distance. The term arises from the rotation of the position vector. The key is to evaluate .
The following resource provides a rigorous, step-by-step derivation of the velocity vector in polar coordinates by first finding the time derivatives of the polar unit vectors. This is a fundamental proof that underpins much of rotational mechanics.
This chapter from a Lehman College physics course provides a rigorous, calculus-based derivation of the velocity vector for circular motion. It's a perfect match for your preference for proof-based learning.
Please read Section 6.3, 'Circular Motion: Velocity and Angular Velocity' (starts on page 6-7). This section derives the expression for velocity by differentiating the position vector expressed in polar coordinates. Pay close attention to equation (6.3.5) and the steps leading to (6.3.9), which show that \vec{v}(t) = r rac{d heta}{dt}\hat{ heta}(t). The geometric derivation in subsection 6.3.1 is also worth reviewing as an alternative perspective.
As you saw in the reading, the derivation shows that . For circular motion, the radius is constant, so . The velocity expression simplifies to:
This equation states that the velocity vector has a magnitude of and points in the tangential direction .
Now, let's prove this is identical to the cross product .
Consider motion in the -plane, with the axis of rotation along the -axis.
Let's compute the cross product:
Using the cyclic property of unit vector cross products ( and ):
Recognizing that the term in the parenthesis is the definition of the tangential unit vector , we have:
This is identical to the result from our differentiation, thus proving the fundamental relationship for circular motion:
4. Proof: The Relationship between Linear and Angular Acceleration
Having established , we can find the acceleration by differentiating with respect to time. We use the product rule for cross products, remembering that both (in non-uniform motion) and can change with time.
Let's analyze the two resulting terms:
-
First term:
By definition, , the angular acceleration. So this term is .- Direction: is along the axis of rotation (e.g., ), and is in the plane of rotation. Their cross product, by the right-hand rule, points along the tangent ().
- Magnitude: .
This term is exactly the tangential acceleration, , which changes the magnitude of the velocity. This proves our second learning outcome:
-
Second term:
We know that . So this term is .
Since , this term becomes .
This term is the centripetal acceleration, .
To understand its properties, we use the vector triple product identity: .
For circular motion in a plane, is perpendicular to , so their dot product . The expression simplifies dramatically:- Direction: The negative sign shows that the acceleration is in the opposite direction to the position vector , meaning it points radially inward, towards the center.
- Magnitude: .
This perfectly matches our formula for centripetal acceleration.
Combining the two components, we arrive at the complete vector expression for acceleration in circular motion:
Test your understanding!
A particle moves in the -plane. Its angular velocity is rad/s and its angular acceleration is rad/s². At the instant it passes through the position m, find its linear velocity , tangential acceleration , and centripetal acceleration .
Show answer
We apply the vector formulas we just derived.
1. Linear Velocity :
The velocity is 12 m/s in the positive y-direction, which is tangent to the circular path at that point.
2. Tangential Acceleration :
The tangential acceleration is in the negative y-direction, opposite to the velocity. This means the particle is slowing down, which is consistent with being opposite to .
3. Centripetal Acceleration :
We can use either or the simpler form . Let's use the first one to practice. We already found .
Using the simpler form as a check:
The centripetal acceleration is in the negative x-direction, pointing from the particle back toward the origin (the center of the circle).
Conclusion
In this lesson, we have moved from scalar descriptions to a more powerful and general vector framework for circular motion. Through rigorous, calculus-based proofs, we have established the fundamental connections between linear and angular kinematic quantities.
Key Takeaways:
- Angular velocity () and angular acceleration () are axial vectors, with directions defined by the right-hand rule.
- The linear velocity of a point on a rotating body is given by the cross product .
- The total linear acceleration has two components derived from differentiating the velocity vector:
- Tangential Acceleration: , which arises from a change in angular speed.
- Centripetal Acceleration: , which arises from the change in the direction of velocity.
Preview of the Next Lesson:
Now that we have rigorously derived the differential relationships connecting position, velocity, and acceleration in rotation, we are equipped to solve a wider class of problems. In the next lesson, we will focus on cases where the angular acceleration is not constant but varies with time, . This will require us to use integration to find the angular velocity and angular position as functions of time.