Welcome back. In our last lesson, we introduced the Mechanics, Dynamics, and Aesthetics (MDA) framework, defining its core components and the different perspectives of the designer and the player. We established that designers build by defining Mechanics to generate Dynamics, which in turn evoke Aesthetics, while players experience this chain in reverse.
Now, we will bring this theory to life. This lesson focuses on using the MDA framework to analyze existing games. By deconstructing real-world examples, you'll develop the critical eye of a game designer, learning to see past the surface-level experience to the underlying systems that create it. We will look at a variety of games, paying special attention to narrative-focused examples that will be directly relevant as you begin to conceptualize your interactive Mahabharata project. Your background in user research, where you analyze behaviors to understand user needs, aligns perfectly with this process. You're essentially shifting your focus from a user's journey through an app to a player's emotional journey through a game.
Deconstructing a Game: A Simple Example
The best way to learn MDA analysis is to start with a simple, clear case. We'll look at the popular mobile game Attack Hole, which has a very straightforward design. The following video segment breaks down its MDA structure.
How to become a better game designer - The MDA Framework and Game Design Analysis
This video from Homa Academy provides an excellent, concise breakdown of a hyper-casual game using the MDA framework.
Watch the section that analyzes Attack Hole, from the breakdown. Pay close attention to how the presenter connects each mechanic to a specific dynamic and then to the resulting aesthetic.
As the video demonstrates, we can map the game's components neatly onto the framework:
-
Mechanics: These are the game's core rules and systems.
- A player-controlled hole on the screen.
- A "tap and drag" control scheme to move the hole.
- A rule stating that the hole consumes any object smaller than it.
- A rule that the hole grows in size after consuming a certain amount of objects.
- A timer that limits the duration of the level.
-
Dynamics: This is the gameplay that emerges when the player interacts with the mechanics.
- The player strategically navigates the level to consume objects efficiently.
- A "race against the clock" emerges due to the timer.
- The player prioritizes smaller objects first to enable the consumption of larger objects later.
- A feeling of increasing momentum as the hole grows and consumes things faster.
-
Aesthetics: These are the emotions evoked by the dynamics.
- Growth & Power: The feeling of becoming bigger and more powerful.
- Challenge: The tension of trying to clear the level before the timer runs out.
- Satisfaction & Completion: The rewarding feeling of consuming everything on the screen.
This M -> D -> A chain shows how a few simple rules can combine to create a compelling emotional experience. A key skill in design is predicting how a change in a mechanic will ripple through the entire system. For instance, as the video presenter asks, what would happen if you removed the timer mechanic? The dynamic of "racing the clock" would vanish, which would significantly reduce the "Challenge" aesthetic and lessen the feeling of satisfaction upon completion. The game would shift from a tense challenge to a more relaxed, "zen-like" activity of cleaning up, an aesthetic known as Submission (game as a pastime).
The Ripple Effect: How One Mechanic Changes Everything
Great game design often hinges on a few key mechanics that profoundly define the experience. Changing a single rule can transform how a game feels. Let's look at two powerful examples.
First, let's consider the save system in the horror game Alien: Isolation. The designers' core aesthetic goal was terror.
How to become a better game designer - The MDA Framework and Game Design Analysis
This segment discusses how a seemingly minor decision about the save system in Alien: Isolation was crucial to achieving the game's intended aesthetic.
Please watch from the beginning of the quote from Mark Brown to the end of the explanation. Notice how the consequence of player death (a mechanic) changes player behavior (the dynamic).
As the video explains, an auto-save mechanic would have created a dynamic where players could act recklessly, knowing they would just restart moments before death. This would destroy any feeling of real danger. By using a manual save-point mechanic, the designers created high stakes. This leads to a dynamic of extreme caution, slow-paced exploration, and genuine fear of any sound or movement. The mechanic directly serves the aesthetic goal of terror.
Another fantastic example is the weapon durability system in The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild.
How To Think Like A Game Designer
Game Maker's Toolkit offers a classic analysis of how weapon durability in Breath of the Wild shapes the entire experience.
Watch this segment from the analysis of swords in Zelda. Focus on how this one mechanic encourages a wide range of player behaviors.
Here's the MDA breakdown:
- Mechanic: Weapons have a hidden durability value that decreases with use, eventually causing them to break.
- Dynamics:
- Players constantly scavenge for new weapons.
- Players are encouraged to avoid direct combat and find creative solutions (e.g., using the environment).
- Players experiment with a wider variety of weapons instead of relying on one favorite.
- Dramatic moments are created when a weapon breaks mid-fight.
- Aesthetics:
- Discovery: The constant need for new tools pushes players to explore the world.
- Expression: Players feel clever and creative when they solve problems without fighting.
- Challenge: Players must manage a constantly changing inventory and adapt their strategy.
Without this single mechanic, the game's dynamics would be far more conventional, and the aesthetics of exploration and creativity would be significantly diminished.
MDA in Interactive Narratives
Now let's apply this framework directly to your area of interest: interactive stories. Just as action games have mechanics for jumping and shooting, narrative games have mechanics that govern how the story is revealed and influenced.
The writer and designer Aaron A. Reed has done excellent work in this area. We'll read a few excerpts from his article "Narrative Mechanics, Narrative Dynamics."
Narrative Mechanics, Narrative Dynamics | by Aaron A. Reed
This first part uses the classic game Myst to provide a clear example of MDA within a narrative and puzzle-based context.
Please read the section starting with "Briefly, the mechanics". Note how the simple mechanics of clicking combine to create the dynamic of exploration and the aesthetic of loneliness.
The analysis of Myst shows how fundamental game mechanics (movement, interaction) work in service of a narrative aesthetic. Reed then builds on this to define a vocabulary specific to story-games.
Narrative Mechanics, Narrative Dynamics | by Aaron A. Reed
These sections introduce the core concepts of "narrative mechanics" and "narrative dynamics," which are crucial for designing your own interactive story.
First, read the two paragraphs under the heading "How can we apply these frameworks to the space of storygames?" This starts with "We can begin" and defines five key narrative mechanics. As you read them, think about how they might apply to telling a story from the Mahabharata. Next, read the following paragraph, which begins "There are more examples". This section defines narrative dynamics and provides the excellent example of "lawnmowering" a conversation tree.
This gives you a powerful toolkit for design. Your core idea of a choice-driven story relies on the "Explicit story choice" mechanic. But you can see how other mechanics could enrich the experience:
- Delayed story choice: A choice a child makes early on (e.g., to be kind or deceptive to a character) could be stored as a variable and change a scene much later in the story. This creates a powerful dynamic of consequence.
- Challenge-gated content: You could present a simple riddle based on a character's nature. Answering correctly (overcoming the challenge) might reveal a special story or piece of information, creating a dynamic of discovery and an aesthetic of mastery.
- Story dumps: Clicking on an object in the scenery, like a divine weapon or a piece of jewelry, could trigger a short narration about its history. This is a simple way to add depth to the world.

This diagram illustrates the relationship between Mechanics, Dynamics, and Aesthetics. For a narrative game, the "Embedded Narrative" (the story you write) is part of the Mechanics, the "Emergent Narrative" (the story the player creates through their actions) is the Dynamic, and the "Interpreted Narrative" (the story the player feels and understands) is the Aesthetic.
Thinking in terms of these specific narrative mechanics will help you move from a general idea of "branching choices" to a more structured and sophisticated design.
Conclusion
In this lesson, we have moved from defining MDA to actively using it as an analytical tool. By breaking down games like Attack Hole, Alien: Isolation, and Breath of the Wild, we've seen how specific, deliberate mechanical choices are the foundation for creating powerful player emotions. Most importantly, we've established a vocabulary for narrative design that you can directly apply to your own project.
Key Takeaways:
- MDA provides a practical framework for analyzing why games feel the way they do.
- A single mechanic, like a save system or weapon durability, can fundamentally define a game's dynamics and aesthetics.
- Narrative games use specific narrative mechanics (like explicit choice, delayed choice, and gating) to create narrative dynamics (like consequence, discovery, and exploration).
- Effective design involves choosing mechanics that will generate the dynamics needed to achieve your target aesthetic.
In our next lesson, we will explore another crucial design concept: the core game loop. We'll examine how designers create repeating cycles of activity that keep players engaged session after session, a concept that builds directly on our understanding of game dynamics.